A First Study of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale with Adolescents

By R. Gilman, E. Scott Huebner, J. Laughlin. 2000

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0d81e25a0d5d48e6f1815c4d1f200f789e3d69d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Youth life satisfaction measures: a review (2009, methodology): “, 1998), the BASC (Gilman et al., 2000), and the BASC Self Report of Personality scales (Greenspoon & Saklofske, 1997).”
Electronic Bullying and Victimization and Life Satisfaction in Middle School Students (2012, background): “In addition, convergent and discriminant validity has been demonstrated through appropriate correlations with parent reports and other self-report measures ( Gilman et al. 2000; Huebner 1994).”
The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study (2006, background): “The MSLSS has been shown to have adequate reliability and validity in students without disabilities (Gilman et al., 2000; Huebner, 1994; Huebner et al., 1998) and in students with cognitive disabilities (Brantley, Huebner, & Nagle, 2002; McCullough & Huebner, 2003).”
A Cross-Cultural Study of the Levels and Correlates of Life Satisfaction among Adolescents (2005, methodology): “students in the same grades in a small city in a southeastern state were used (Gilman et al., 2000; Huebner et al., 1998).”
Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports: Analyses of Mean Scores and Response Style Differences (2008, methodology): “Although there is no uniform method to item parceling (Nasser and Wisenbaker, 2003), some constraints were placed on how the items were parceled, which have been applied in previous research with the MSLSS (Gilman et al., 2000).”
Youth Life Satisfaction: A Review of the Literature (2009, background): “1989; Dew and Huebner 1994; Huebner 1991a, 1995; Huebner and Alderman 1993; Huebner and Dew 1996), the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS: Huebner 1994) (e.g. Adelman et al. 1989; Gilman and Huebner 1997; Gilman et al. 2000; Huebner 1994; Huebner et al. 1998), the Brief Multid”
A First Study of Perfectionism and Multidimensional Life Satisfaction among Adolescents (2003, background): “…acceptable psychometric properties across Grades 3 through 12, including stability coefficients ranging from .77 to .86 for the domain scores (Gilman et al., 2000; Huebner & Gilman, 2002), strong evidence of construct validity as indicated by both confirmatory (e.g., Gilman 224 JOURNAL OF…”
Review of Life Satisfaction Measures for Adolescents (2000, background): “Finally, results of separate confirmatory factor analyses have supported the multidimensional model for students in the USA (Gilman et al., 2000; Huebner et al., 1998), Spain (Laughlin, Huebner, Casas, Alsinet, & Rosich, 2000), and South Korea (Park, 2000).”
Chinese children’s perceived school satisfaction: the role of contextual and intrapersonal factors (2010, background): “The scale has been found to have high reliability (α = 0.84) (Gilman et al., 2000).”
An Ecological View of School Satisfaction in Adolescence: Linkages Between Social Support and Behavior Problems (2007, methodology): “The School subscale correlates significantly with Epstein and McPartland’s (1976) Quality of School Life Scale (r=0.68: Huebner 1994) and the Attitude Towards School subscale of Reynolds and Kamphaus’ (1992) Behavior Assessment Scale for Children (BASC: r=�0.70: Gilman et al. 2000 ).”
Peer Victimization and Prosocial Experiences and Emotional Well-Being of Middle School Students. (2007, result): “The scores on these measures were comparable to those reported in other studies with adolescents and upper-elementary students (Crick & Grotpeter, 1996; Gilman et al., 2000; Huebner et al., 1998; Laurent et al., 1999).”