An Examination of the Relationship between Achievement Values and Perceptions of Barriers among Low-SES African American and Latino Students.
By April Z. Taylor, S. Graham. 2007
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bff838ccbaaf36cbbab5e27797da198d31b37f5e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Jenna Cambria
- Allan Wigfield
- Jessica T. DeCuir‐Gunby
- P. Schutz
- Terrell Lamont Strayhorn
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Hanna Eklöf
- H. Watt
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jenna Cambria
- Allan Wigfield
- Jessica T. DeCuir‐Gunby
- P. Schutz
- Terrell Lamont Strayhorn
- Hanna Eklöf
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Chris S. Hulleman
Citations in the corpus
- Researching Race Within Educational Psychology Contexts (2014, methodology): “Similarly using a race-reimaged approach, Taylor and Graham (2007) used peer nomination procedures to examine the relationship between achievement values and perceptions of barriers of low socioeconomic status (SES) African American and Latino/a students across three grade levels—second, fourth,…”
- The Role of Schools, Families, and Psychological Variables on Math Achievement of Black High School Students (2010, background): “The gap is even wider between White 10th grade high school students and their Black counterparts (Jencks & Phillips, 1998; Taylor & Graham, 2007; U. S. Commission on Civil Rights, 2004).”
- Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes (2010, methodology): “These items correlate with a more traditional task value measure developed by Scott ( 1965 ) , which Taylor and Graham ( 2007 ) say gives their measure construct validity .”
- Expectancy-value theory: retrospective and prospective (2010, methodology): “Another alternative is to use ‘‘indirect’’ self-report measures such as those used by Graham and her colleagues (Graham & Taylor, 2002; Taylor & Graham, 2007) to measure task value; such measures have the potential of avoiding some of the concerns about social desirability of the direct measures.”