A Model Incorporating the Rationale and Purpose for Conducting Mixed-Methods Research in Special Education and Beyond
By Kathleen M. T. Collins, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Ida Sutton. 2006
529 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf739db56291eed7e8209c9f4403e7ebe62d16e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- José F. Molina-Azorίn
- Mieke Heyvaert
- Nancy L. Leech
- Rebecca M. Bustamante
- Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
- J. Nelson
- José F. Molina-Azorín
- J. Conner
Citations in the corpus
- Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: Applications and contributions (2012, background): “Creswell and Plano Clark (2007) stated that despite its value, conducting mixed methods research is not easy.”
- The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research (2011, background): “Collins, Onwuegbuzie, and Sutton (2006) provided a comprehensive list of reasons or purposes for conducting mixed methods research, and each of these purposes was grouped under one of the four main rationales: participant enrichment, instrument fidelity, treatment integrity, and significance…”
- Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007, background): “Most recently, Collins, Onwuegbuzie, and Sutton (2006) identified four rationales for conducting mixed research: participant enrichment (e.g., mixing quantitative and qualitative research to optimize the sample using techniques that include recruiting participants, engaging in activities such as…”
- Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. (2010, methodology): “Our reporting standards are based on the framework of Collins, Onwuegbuzie, and Sutton (2006).”
- Learning to unlearn: How a service-learning project can help teacher candidates to reframe urban students (2010, methodology): “This study draws on both qualitative and quantitative data to achieve what Collins, Onwuegbuzie, and Sutton (2006) call “significance enhancement,” that is, to maximize interpretations and understanding of the phenomenon of interest.”
- Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013, background): “Making explicit the rationale for conducting an MMR study stimulates a thoughtful decision process concerning the design and implementation of the study (cf. Collins et al., 2006).”
- Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. (2012, background): “Qualitative research can frequently offer the explanatory power to support, and add depth to, quantitative findings in the given research area [3,4].”
- Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature (2008, background): “Collins, Onwuegbuzie, and Sutton (2006) conceptualized mixed methods research as comprising the following 13 distinct steps: 1.”
- An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. (2007, methodology): “Moreover, using quantitative and qualitative data analysis techniques side-by-side typically enhances the interpretation of significant findings in research (Collins et al., 2006; Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2004, 2006).”
- Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures 1 (2006, background): “Collins et al. (2006) have identified the following four major rationales for mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches: participant enrichment (i.”
- Mixed Research as a Tool for Developing Quantitative Instruments (2010, background): “For a discussion of this concept, see Collins et al. (2006).”