The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research

By José F. Molina-Azorίn. 2011

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6cdc688c0e7c45c0e2525c099e34a8613256c1a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Jessica A. Wertz
2. Nancy Anderson
3. Yuchun Zhou
4. Courtney McKim
5. V. P. Plano Clark
6. K. Schumacher
7. Christine Miaskowski

In Marketing

1. Jessica A. Wertz
2. Nancy Anderson
3. Yuchun Zhou
4. Courtney McKim
5. V. P. Plano Clark
6. K. Schumacher
7. Christine Miaskowski

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Jessica A. Wertz
2. Nancy Anderson
3. Yuchun Zhou
4. Courtney McKim
5. V. P. Plano Clark
6. K. Schumacher
7. Christine Miaskowski

Citations in the corpus

• The Value of Mixed Methods Research (2017, result): “Another study in the business field found mixed methods articles received more citations than studies not utilizing mixed methods, which the researcher attributed to mixed methods studies being more valuable (Molina-Azorin, 2011).”
• Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs (2015, methodology): “…the area of mixed methods research have been useful for examining the prevalence, designs, procedures, issues, and value associated with mixed methods research (e.g., Ivankova & Kawamura, 2010; Molina-Azorin, 2011; Plano Clark, 2010; Ross & Onwuegbuzie, 2012; Stentz, Plano Clark, & Matkin, 2012).”