How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change?
By Allan Afuah. 2000
522 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd684d48b3af936d63e24cf3a0e1eea14d64c70b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Dovev Lavie
- Geert Duysters
- Kevin Zheng Zhou
- Marcel Bogers
- Raphael Amit
- Harbir Singh
- Christoph Zott
- Mike W. Peng
Citations in the corpus
- The Choice of Organizational Governance Form and Performance: Predictions from Transaction Cost, Resource-based, and Real Options Theories (2003, background): “For instance, prior work has examined the competitive implications of competence in functional areas such as manufacturing (e.g.,Pisano, 1994), technology development (e.g.,Afuah, 2000), and marketing (e.g.,Schoenecker & Cooper, 1998).”
- The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth (2014, background): “Social ties play an important role in developing innovations (Afuah, 2000), as most innovations are rooted not exclusively within firms, but instead occur at the intersections with actors outside the firm, including competitors, customers, suppliers, distributors (Pisano, 1990) and government (Peng…”
- Networks of innovators: a longitudinal perspective (2003, background): “Interestingly, in studying the network of firms which make reduced instruction set computer technology, Afuah (2000) found that the declining competence of “co-opetitors” such as suppliers and customers actually has a significant impact on the performance of the partnering firm depending on whethe”
- Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem (2017, background): “-----------------------------Insert Figure 1 about here -----------------------------Due to a variety of stakeholders, it is much bigger and richer than a firm’s immediate customer‒supplier network (Adner and Kapoor, 2010; Afuah, 2000; Eisenhardt and Galunic, 2000; Iansiti and Levien, 2004; Moore, 1”
- Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures (2008, background): “…et al., 2004; Handfield et al., 1999; Petersen et al., 2003, 2005; Prahinski and Benton, 2004; Ragatz et al., 1997), and studies of supplier involvement show that greater supplier involvement benefits the innovation (Afuah, 2000) or the manufacturer’s financial performance (Carr and Pearson, 1999).”
- Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: an organizational economics approach to strategic management (2005, background): “Seminal resource-based theoretical and empirical papers include: Afuah (2000, 2002), Amit and Schoemaker (1993), Argyres (1996), Barney (1986, 1991), Brush and Artz (1999), Chang (1996), Chatterjee and Wernerfelt (1991), Chi (1994), Coff (1997), Conner (1991), Dierickx and Cool (1989), Eisenhardt…”
- Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations (2010, background): “These approaches have focused on understanding coordination among partners in exchange networks that are characterized by simultaneous cooperation and competition (Brandenburger and Nalebuff, 1997; Afuah, 2000).”
- Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions (2012, background): “…to their knowledge (e.g., Bierly and Chakrabarti, 1996; Kogut and Zander, 1996; Yli-Renko et al., 2001) and capabilities (e.g., Teece et al., 1997; Afuah, 2000; Danneels, 2002; Gatignon et al., 2002; Hill and Rothaermel, 2003; Rothaermel and Deeds, 2004), and more generally to sources of…”
- Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances (2000, background): “Interestingly, Afuah (2000) provides evidence on the costs of strong relationships.”
- The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis (2016, unknown): “…an organisation’s strategy and design in the face of OI directly links to the strategy and design of external partners, which is particularly important in the context of innovation ecosystems where there is a coopetition process involving multiple stakeholders (Afuah 2000; Bouncken et al. 2015).”
- Strategic Entrepreneurs at Work: The Nature, Discovery, and Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities (2007, background): “Strategic factor innovation, or innovation affecting existing raw materials, represents another type of technological opportunity (Barney, 1986; Afuah, 2000).”