Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances
By Bharat Anand, Tarun Khanna. 2000
1,819 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5449f937c506785fef47d55f686c5ff08cd200c4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike W. Peng
- Mike Wright
- K. Meyer
- Michael A. Hitt
- Jeffrey J. Reuer
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Dovev Lavie
- Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
In Economics and Econometrics
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
- K. Meyer
- Mike Wright
- Christopher B. Bingham
- Michael A. Hitt
- Rajshree Agarwal
- Timothy G. Pollock
Citations in the corpus
- Do Innovations Really Pay Off? Total Stock Market Returns to Innovation (2009, neutral): “On the other hand, such announcements may lead to positive returns as they enable market expansion, deter competitor entry, improve probability of success and enhance firms' competitive position (Aaker 1995, Suárez 2002, Anand and Khanna 2000, Das et al. 1998, Doukas and Switzer 1992).”
- Modes of Cooperative R&D Commercialization by Start-ups (2009, positive): “For example, Oxley (1997) uses a hierarchy of alliance types, with bilateral contracting representing a licensing-type relationship, while Anand and Khanna (2000) explore the degree to which learning effects exist for licensees.”
- Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry (2005, positive): “In addition, we believe that the client fixed effect might be also picking up some variance in the learning associated with repeated interaction with clients (Anand and Khanna, 2000).”
- Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance (2001, positive): “On the other hand, empirical evidence indicates that abnormal returns from alliances are greater for small firms compared to large firms (Anand and Khanna, 2000; Stuart, 2000; Das, Sen, and Sengupta, 1998; Koh and Venkataraman, 1991).”
- Proximity and Inter-Organizational Collaboration: A Literature Review (2006, positive): “Another important consideration for managers is that the ability of a firm to benefit from an alliance is largely a function of the dyad in question, rather than of either of the individual firms (Anand and Khanna 2000; Lambe et al. 2002; Lane and Lubatkin 1998).”
- Learning Sequences: Their Existence, Effect, and Evolution (2012, background): “Overall, although many studies have suggested that greater performance from learning stems from enlarging the number (Anand & Khanna, 2000; Argote, 1999) or variety (Hayward, 2002; Schilling, Vidal, Ployhart, & Marangoni , 2003) of experiences to be observed, our study suggests the complementary…”
- A Review of Approaches to Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm† (2007, background): “Researchers can do this by incorporating firm dummy variables (Anand & Khanna, 2000; Henderson & Cockburn, 1994).”
- Alliance management capability and firm performance: : Using resource-based theory to look inside the process black box (2015, background): “Yet, alliance management capabilities are rare and heterogeneously distributed (Anand and Khanna, 2000; Rothaermel and Deeds, 2006).”
- Cross-Sector Alliance Learning and Effectiveness of Voluntary Codes of Corporate Social Responsibility (2006, background): “Other scholars view collaborations as facilitators of new knowledge creation besides the established view that learning results from the transfer of existing knowledge (Anand and Khanna 2000; Larsson et al. 1998; Kale, Singh, and Perlmutter 2000).”
- Divestiture and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2010, background): “Such superiority may reside in managerial capability (Chang, 1996; e.g., a better sense of timing), a better network (Anand & Khanna, 2000; Hoang & Antoncic, 2003; Walter et al., 2006; e.g., which helps to find the best buyer), or more money (e.g., to be able to afford top-tier advisers).”