A Meta-Analysis of Variance Accounted for and Factor Loadings in Exploratory Factor Analysis

By R. Peterson. 2000

559 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbb1c282af02b4e6acce064b1251a80b8e6e5cce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Workplace isolation: salespeople and supervisors in USA (2011, methodology): “The scale purification process of retaining scale items with the highest factor loadings was used to increase the amount of common variance among the items (Peterson 2000 ; Lassk, Marshall, Cravens and Moncrief 2001 ; Bhuian, Menguc and Borsboom 2005 ).”
Measuring Residents’ Attitudes toward Sustainable Tourism: A Reexamination of the Sustainable Tourism Attitude Scale (2011, methodology): “The standard psychometric procedure for scale development has seven stages (Churchill 1979; DeVellis 1991; Nunnally 1978; Peterson 2000): (1) determine what to measure, (2) generate items to measure the construct of interest, (3) develop the final list of items and determine the type of rating…”
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China (2008, background): “They all exceed the threshold value of 0.50 suggested by Peterson (2000).”
Organic food products in China: determinants of consumers’ purchase intentions (2012, background): “The higher the factor loadings, the better the results (Peterson 2000; Hair et al. 2006).”
Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions (2010, background): “50 suggested by Peterson (2000). AVE ranged from 0.”
University Instructors’ Achievement Goals for Teaching (2019, methodology): “The inspection of the factor loadings of all final models (i.e., those with an adequate fit), displayed in Table 3, showed that for all models the loadings clearly exceeded the cutoff-criterion of .40 determined by Peterson (2000), and are therefore considered to be satisfactory.”
Brand management in higher education: The University Brand Personality Scale (2016, unknown): “Black, Babin, & Anderson, 2006; Peterson, 2000).”
Destination Personality: An Application of Brand Personality to Tourism Destinations (2006, methodology): “Established standards (e.g., Anderson and Gerbing 1988; Churchill 1979; Gerbing and Anderson 1988; Hair et al. 1998) and emerging guidance (e.g., Peterson 2000) in the literature were used in item reduction and assessment of the factor structure.”
An Examination of the Validity of SUS-TAS in Cross-Cultures (2008, methodology): “…to a standard psychometric procedure (e.g., Churchill 1979; Nunnaly 1978; DeVellis 1991) and emerging guidance in the literature (e.g., Peterson 2000), there are seven stages in scale development: (1) determine what to measure, (2) generate items to measure the construct of interest,…”