Prosocial Behavior in Intergroup Relations: How Donor Self-Construal and Recipient Group-Membership Shape Generosity

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review and Framework for Thinking about the Drivers of Prosocial Consumer Behavior (2020, background): “The negative emotion of guilt has been studied extensively in the domain of encouraging prosocial consumer behaviors (Coulter and Pinto 1995; Huhmann and Brotherton 1997; Basil, Ridgway, and Basil 2008; Duhachek, Agrawal, and Han 2012).”
Warm glow vs. altruistic values: How important is intrinsic emotional reward in proenvironmental behavior? (2017, background): “Duclos and Barasch (2014) found that the belief that helping others contributed to personal happiness had a significant influence on prosocial behaviors.”
I'm Moral, but I Won't Help You: The Distinct Roles of Empathy and Justice in Donations (2014, background): “…recipients in terms of number or unit (e.g., a single identifiable victim, statistical victims, victims that are perceived as entitative; Kogut and Ritov 2007; Small, Loewenstein, and Slovic 2007; Smith et al. 2013) or by group membership (Duclos and Barasch 2014; Winterich, Mittal, and Ross 2009).”
When public recognition for charitable giving backfires: The role of independent self-construal (2018, background): “There is also evidence, however, that US states that are more independent tend to give more (Kemmelmeier, Jambor, and Letner 2006; Conway et al. 2001), and that self-construal does not produce a main effect on giving (Duclos and Barasch 2014).”