HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling

By Y. F. Cheong, Anthony Bryk. 2000

4,349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9befd0ced2d873abec83b3be3c2c82fbf04418c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity (2009, methodology): “Hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) for three-level data (Raudenbush et al., 2004) was used to avoid the potential problems outlined above and model cross-level interaction effects.”
Escaping bullying: The simultaneous impact of individual and unit-level bullying on turnover intentions (2012, methodology): “To test this hypothesis, we conducted a cross-level moderator analysis in HLM (e.g. Raudenbush et al., 2004).”
Handbook of multilevel analysis (2008, methodology): “An extensive treatment of many generic numerical optimization procedures, including Newton-Raphson and BFGS, with derivations of their properties, can be found in Nocedal and Wright [86].”
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Maintaining Sexual Desire in Intimate Relationships: The Importance of Approach Goals (2008, unknown): “Multilevel modeling in the HLM computer program (HLMwin, Version. 5.02; Raudenbush et al., 2000) was used to examine the hypotheses linking social goals, sexual goals, relationship events, and sexual desire.”
A new perspective on a fundamental debate: a multilevel approach to industry, corporate, and business unit effects (2006, methodology): “…errors based upon generalized estimating equations analysis, which should indirectly correct for such a violation of the independence assumptions (Raudenbush et al., 2000), we also attempted to assess the robustness of the cross-nested modeling through an alternative model specification in which…”