Corporate Governance Structure and the Valuation of Australian Firms: Is There Value in Ticking the Boxes?

By Darren Henry. 2008

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b99b2dfbebdcd986b1cfe56a41a7777d364fa428

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Collins G. Ntim
2. Kwaku Opong
3. Ranjith Appuhami
4. Mohammed Bhuyan
5. Waleed M. Al-Bassam
6. Yvonne Downs
7. J. Su
8. Searat Ali

In Strategy and Management

1. Collins G. Ntim
2. Ranjith Appuhami
3. Mohammed Bhuyan
4. Benjamin Liu
5. Kwaku Opong
6. J. Su
7. Searat Ali
8. Waleed M. Al-Bassam

Citations in the corpus

• Examining the influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency: Evidence from top service firms in Australia (2015, methodology): “The findings of the time trends analysis on the independent variables are consistentwith previous studies on corporate governance inAustralia (Henry, 2008; Christensen et al., 2010).”
• The Relative Value Relevance of Shareholder Versus Stakeholder Corporate Governance Disclosure Policy Reforms in South Africa (2012, unknown): “Thus, given the panel nature of our data and in line with Henry (2008) and Guest (2009), we estimate our regressions using panel data estimation technique in order to address endogeneity problems that may arise from potential unobserved firm-level heterogeneity.”
• Corporate Governance, Accounting and Finance: A Review (2011, unknown): “8 Henry (2008) also documents corporate governance characteristics of Australian firms before 2003.”
• Corporate Boards and Ownership Structure as Antecedents of Corporate Governance Disclosure in Saudi Arabian Publicly Listed Corporations (2018, background): “…reducing corporate financial risk in developing countries (Gompers et al., 2003; Klapper & Love, 2004; Beiner et al., 2006; Haniffa & Hudaib, 2006; Henry, 2008; Bauer et al., 2010; Renders et al., 2010; Giroud & Mueller, 2011; Bozec & Bozec, 2012; Ntim et al., 2012a, 2013, 2015a, b; Tariq &…”
• Corporate Governance Quality, Audit Fees and Non-Audit Services Fees (2011, background): “Henry (2008), commenting on the differences in corporate governance between Australia and the UK, notes that UK companies are subject to more stringent requirements in relation to board meetings, limits on directors’ outside workloads, shareholder approval of long-term executive director incentive…”
• Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting perspective (2010, background): “…Finance Journal j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r.com/ locate /pacf in oversight through voluntary or legislative enforcement of codes of governance practice (Black, 2001; Black et al., 2005, 2006; Henry, 2008), and enhanced disclosure informativeness (Beekes and Brown, 2006).”
• Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo‐Institutional Framework (2013, unknown): “These contextual developments appear to have substantially impaired the effectiveness of the market for corporate and managerial control in South Africa (Henry, 2008).”
• Voluntary corporate governance structure and financial distress: Evidence from Australia (2015, background): “Following Henry (2008), director ownership (DIROWN) is measured as the percentage of total company equity held by all company directors.”
• Voluntary Corporate Governance Disclosures by Post-Apartheid South African Corporations (2012, unknown): “Finally, following prior research (Cooke, 1992; Barako et al., 2006; Henry, 2008), we predict that the SACGDI will vary across different industries and financial years and, thus, we introduce year (2002 to 2006) and industry dummies for the five remaining industries[4].”
• The Impact of Corporate Board Meetings on Corporate Performance in South Africa (2011, unknown): “First, companies with higher investment avenues grow faster (Henry 2008), and are likely to be associated with higher corporate performance.”
• Does corporate governance quality affect default risk? The role of growth opportunities and stock liquidity (2018, background): “3 Henry (2008) finds no support of individual governance mechanisms in explaining firm value for Australian firms.”
• More on the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance in the UK : evidence from the application of generalized method of moments estimation (2016, methodology): “In line with the above arguments, previous studies have found a positive relationship between corporate performance and firms’ growth (see for example, Gompers et al. 2003; and Henry, 2008).”