Can e-learning replace classroom learning?

1,078 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Teaching and Learning Principles of Microeconomics Online: An Empirical Assessment (2009, background): “Others point to traditional classroom benefits such as immediate response to student questions and frequent student-to-student interaction (Zhang et al. 2004).”
Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty (2012, background): “Despite these benefits, e-learning has a higher drop-out rate than traditional delivered instruction (Bell & Kozlowski, 2002; Brown, 2001; Zhang et al., 2004).”
Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results (2009, background): “Teaching materials affect the e-learning effectiveness (Littlejohn, Falconer, & Mcgill, 2008; Zhang et al., 2004).”
Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India (2020, neutral): “For example, Zhang, Zhao, Zhou, and Nunamaker (2004) compared e-learning with classroom learning for finding out if e-learning can replace the more traditional form of teaching.”
Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning (2008, background): “Text-based learning content often leads to boredom for students and can prevent them from obtaining a clear understanding of the subject matter (Zhang, Zhao, Zhou, & Nunamaker, 2004).”