Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results

By Byoung-Chan Lee, Jeong-Ok Yoon, In Lee. Comput. Educ., 2009

680 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51b23ce50d9be75cba02a4c7d2961c825745fbef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Antecedents and consequences of e‐learning acceptance (2011, methodology): “…or many others, to deliver learning materials to users (Welsh et al ., 2003; Engelbrecht, 2005), and utilizes Web-based communication, collaboration, knowledge transfer and training to support users’ active learning without the time and space barriers (Kelly & Bauer, 2004; Lee et al ., 2009).”
Understanding the Most Important Facilitators and Barriers for Online Education during COVID-19 through Online Photovoice Methodology (2020, background): “The review of the studies on online learning (e-learning) and education demonstrated that the studies were conducted on topics such as the quality of education in online learning, the quality of online learning compared to face-to-face education, the online education infrastructure of an institution”
Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective (2020, methodology): “Early forms of distance education date back to 1840, when Isaac Pitman used mail and a shorthand technique in order to teach and collaborate with students [18], and it is taught that the term E-learning began to be used in the educational ﬁeld in the mid-1990s [19].”
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study (2020, result): “…e-learning success factors to maximize the effectiveness of these systems (e.g., Ali & Ahmad, 2011; Fathema, Shannon, & Ross, 2015; Islam, 2013; B. C. Lee, Yoon, & Lee, 2009; J. K. Lee & Lee, 2008; M. C. Lee, 2010; Mohammadi, 2015; Mtebe & Raphael, 2018; Park, 2009; Wahab, 2008; Wang, 2003)).”
Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model (2015, background): “…is enjoyable DeLone and McLean (2003) 0.75 I am pleased enough with e-learning system Lee (2010) 0.64 E-learning satisfies my educational needs Lee, Yoon, and Lee (2009) 0.63 I am satisfied with performance of system Wu et al. (2010) 0.37 E-learning is pleasant to me Lee (2010) 0.57…”
Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model (2019, background): “explained as the learning that is employed through different computational devices, such as computers, mobile phones, tablets, and virtual environments [11].”
Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors (2016, neutral): “…self-efficacy Organisation al support Lee, Hsieh and Ma (2011) E-learning system 357Employe es Organizational support Management support Task equivocality Task interdepende nce Computer self-efficacy Individuals’ experience with computers Subjective norm Lee, Lee and Yoon…”