Financing of women-owned ventures: The impact of gender and other owner -and firm-related variables

By C. Constantinidis, A. Cornet, Simona Asandei. 2006

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b90ef942c23b721d0b90473ab26038ae22b85080

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Romi Kher
2. Shu Yang
3. Susan L. Coleman
4. Scott L. Newbert
5. Alicia Robb
6. S. Poggesi
7. Lei-Yu Wu
8. Aron O'Cass

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Romi Kher
2. Shu Yang
3. Susan L. Coleman
4. Scott L. Newbert
5. Alicia Robb
6. D. Storey
7. Richard J. Arend

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Romi Kher
2. Shu Yang
3. Susan L. Coleman
4. Scott L. Newbert
5. Alicia Robb
6. D. Storey

Citations in the corpus

• What signals matter for social startups? It depends: The influence of gender role congruity on social impact accelerator selection decisions (2019, background): “One form of bias that has received a great deal of attention in the entrepreneurial financing literature is gender (e.g., Brush et al., 2001; Carter et al., 2007; Constantinidis et al., 2006; Eddleston et al., 2016; Malmström et al., 2017; Marlow and Patton, 2005).”
• A comparison of new firm financing by gender: evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data (2009, methodology): “ Constantinidis et al. (2006) found a high level of risk aversion in the women entrepreneurs they interviewed and concluded that women may choose lifestyle types of businesses to balance family and business demands and to avoid dependence on external sources of capital.”