A Tale of Tuned Decks? Anchoring as Accessibility and Anchoring as Adjustment
By Nicholas Epley. 2008
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8f751131d7d52906dde4dc3c88bb8d636bd44c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- B. Englich
- Thomas Gilovich
- Clayton R. Critcher
- Kirsten Soder
- Nicholas Epley
- Richard E. Petty
- Kevin L. Blankenship
- Duane T. Wegener
In Sociology and Political Science
- Nicholas Epley
- Thomas Gilovich
- B. Englich
- Adam Waytz
- John T. Cacioppo
- Clayton R. Critcher
- Kirsten Soder
- Richard E. Petty
Citations in the corpus
- On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. (2007, background): “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1081–1086. Siegel, J. M., Angulo, F. J., Detels, R., Wesch, J., & Mullen, A. (1999). AIDS diagnosis and depression in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: The ameliorating impact of pet ownership. AIDS Care, 11, 157–170. Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Ed”
- Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring (2008, background): “Despite rejecting the anchor by saying that the true answer is higher or lower, people’s judgments are routinely higher following high rather than low anchors (i.e., the anchoring effect, Epley, 2004; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974).”
- Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making (2010, background): “Those same prominent anchoring theories suggest that alternative processes, such as serial adjustment or numeric priming, only influence judgments outside the standard anchoring paradigm (see Epley, 2004, p. 246; Mussweiler & Strack, 2001b, pp. 241, 252).”
- Incidental environmental anchors (2008, background): “But note that the effect of incidental environmental anchors may be more robust than the typical basic anchoring effect (Brewer & Chapman, 2002; Epley, 2004).”
- Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring (2009, background): “Judges’ mood, for example, influences how they judge their own lives (Schwarz & Clore, 1983), other persons (Ottati & Isbell, 1996), or the frequency of risks (Johnson & Tversky, 1983).”