Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice.

By Peter Glick, Susan T. Fiske. 2001

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b858c223f8c806859a8217936b7cfb0a666e429e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Not Competent but Warm... Really? Compensatory Stereotypes in the French-speaking World (2005, background): “…theorists (see Giles & Coupland, 1991) to more recent efforts related to stereotyping of entire social groups guided by SCM (Fiske et al., 2002; Glick & Fiske, 2001; see also Phalet & Poppe, 1997), the present set of studies examined intergroup characterizations in the context of two groups…”
Thinking Well of African Americans: Measuring Complimentary Stereotypes and Negative Prejudice (2006, background): “Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Fiske, 2001; Glick & Xu, 2002; Lin et al., 2005) have proposed that stereotypes of outgroups are often ambivalent along dimensions of competence and warmth.”
Positive Stereotypes Are Pervasive and Powerful (2015, background): “…refined, pure, and fragile than men are often used to justify directing women to occupations and roles that are best suited to their “strengths” (Eagly & Mladinic, 1994), and legitimize paternalistic treatment and attitudes that limit women’s freedoms in their best interest (Glick & Fiske, 2001).”
Confronting prejudice: The who, what, and why of confrontation effectiveness (2013, background): “Contemporary norms surrounding racism suggest that it is a more serious problem than sexism (see Glick & Fiske, 1996, 2001; Rodin, Price, Bryson, & Sanchez, 1990).”
The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. (2007, background): “Thus, the study of cultural stereotypes has gained momentum in recent years (e.g., Devine, 1989; Glick & Fiske, 2001; Jost, Pelham, & Carvallo, 2002).”
Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map (2008, background): “Ambivalent sexism theory (Glick and Fiske, 1996, 2001a) posits that women are paternalized because they traditionally have lower status and power, yet men are intimately interdependent on women (as mothers, wives, and romantic objects).”
Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. (2007, methodology): “On the basis of similar ideas, Fiske and colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002) developed a general stereotype content model and showed that there are two basic and independent dimensions of stereotype content named warmth and competence (see also Fiske et al., 2006; Glick & Fiske, 2001).”
This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype (2005, background): “As individuals seek to maintain a belief that the social structures to which they belong are just and fair, members of groups that confirm worldviews may be particularly welcome, and thus particularly liked (Glick & Fiske, 2001).”
Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. (2011, unknown): “Likewise, benevolent sexist beliefs (Glick & Fiske, 1996, 2001a, 2001b) and complementary (see Jost & Kay, 2005; Kay et al., 2007) or compensatory (see Kay, Czaplin´ski, & Jost, 2009; Kervyn, Yzerbyt, Judd, & Nunes, 2009; Napier, Thorisdottir, & Jost, 2010) stereotypes are especially well suited to…”
When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice (2004, background): “Glick and Fiske (Glick & Fiske, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2001a, 2001b) developed Ambivalent Sexism Theory to describe two forms of sexist prejudice, expressly hostile and subjectively benevolent.”