Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map

By Amy J. C. Cuddy, Susan T. Fiske, Peter Glick. 2008

2,117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54bf6032216a05d5296a64ec2e6be07e918828c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

(S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 (2012, background): “human objects (Abele, 2003; Cuddy et al., 2008).”
Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach (2013, background): “Some of this work organises the traits that people tend to ascribe to themselves and others into two broad clusters, usually referred to as warmth and competence (e.g., Cuddy et al., 2008).”
Contingent Reliance on the Affect Heuristic as a Function of Regulatory Focus (2008, result): “This is consistent with findings suggesting that interpersonal attitudes—and attitudes in general— have both affective and cognitive components (Batra & Ahtola, 1991; Breckler, 1984; Breckler & Wiggins, 1989; Cuddy et al., 2008).”
Gender Differences in Trust Dynamics: Women Trust More than Men Following a Trust Violation (2014, background): “Mediation of gender differences following a t (Bowles et al., 2007; Cuddy et al., 2008; Eagly, 1997) to predict that concern for relationships would lead women, more so than men, to maintain trust following a counterpart's transgressions.”
Investigating User Perception of Gender Bias in Image Search: The Role of Sexism (2018, background): “The Stereotype Content Model [5] holds that we use two key dimensions in our perceptions of others – warmth (i.e., the extent to which we think someone has pro-social intentions) and competence/agency (i.e., the extent to which we believe someone is capable of achieving goals).”
GROUPS AND MORALITY (2014, background): “Fiske, Glick, Cuddy, and colleagues (for a review, see Cuddy et al., 2008) have advanced another two-dimensional model of stereotypes that diverges somewhat from agency and communion.”
Brand personality: theory and dimensionality (2018, background): “, 2007) and also that low status groups are seen as such because they are seen as lacking both competence and warmth (Cuddy et al., 2008).”
Envy As Pain: Rethinking the Nature of Envy and Its Implications for Employees and Organizations (2012, background): “…of warmth and competence that, in varying degrees, elicit emotions of pity, admiration, and contempt, the combination of low warmth and high competence is more likely to elicit hostility (Cuddy et al., 2008) or even Schadenfreude, which is pleasure at another’s misfortune (Smith et al., 1996).”
On the importance of being moral: The Distinctive role of morality in social judgment (2014, background): “Accordingly, when forming impressions we are primarily interested in defining whether someone’s intentions are beneficial or harmful, and with respect to this, communion is more informative than agency (Cuddy et al., 2008; Ybarra et al., 2001).”
The Contaminating Effects of Building Instrumental Ties (2014, background): “Morality is one of the two primary dimensions upon which individuals build their evaluations of both others and themselves (Cuddy, Fiske, and Glick, 2008), making it a fundamental aspect of self-conception.”