Confronting prejudice: The who, what, and why of confrontation effectiveness

By J. Gulker, Aimee Y. Mark, Margo J. Monteith. 2013

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34da83d22ea374b10cee49febd86ee95e7349e16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Charlotte R. Cramer
2. C. Moss‐Racusin
3. Aneta Molenda
4. Kevin Munger
5. Victoria L. Brescoll

In Social Psychology

1. C. Moss‐Racusin
2. Kevin Munger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Charlotte R. Cramer
2. C. Moss‐Racusin
3. Aneta Molenda
4. Kevin Munger
5. Victoria L. Brescoll

Citations in the corpus

• Tweetment Effects on the Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment (2017, background): “There is a sizable body of research that indicates that attempts to reduce prejudiced behavior are more effective when made by members of the ingroup (Rasinski and Czopp 2010; Gulker et al. 2013).”
• Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields (2015, background): “…that people may seek to avoid the threats associated with acknowledging that gender bias undermines the fairness of the existing academic system (Jost & Banaji, 1994; Jost et al., 2004) and that they may be likely to trivialize evidence of gender bias (Czopp & Monteith, 2003; Gulker et al., 2013).”