On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse.

By Daniel Berry, Michael T. Willoughby. Child Development, 2017

644 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Adolescent–Parent Relationships: Progress, Processes, and Prospects (2019, background): “…adolescent information management observed between people in cross-lagged panel models are replicated at a within-person level (when examining associations between daily variation in these same constructs within families; Berry & Willoughby 2017, Keijsers et al. 2016, Villalobos Solís et al. 2015).”
Bidirectional, Longitudinal Associations Between Math Ability and Approximate Number System Precision in Childhood (2018, background): “It is important to note that these models do not allow for full causal inference—although they do provide a window into causation across time (for more discussion see Berry & Willoughby, 2017; Rogosa, 1980).”
Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership (2020, background): “…to address the interest of practitioners and academics alike regarding the drivers of change, which cannot be achieved by measuring constructs only once nor via cross-lagged panel modeling which does not separate within-person changes from between-person differences (Berry & Willoughby, 2017).”