Exact repetition as input enhancement in second language acquisition

By E. D. Jensen, Thora Vinther. 2003

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis (2016, background): “Jensen and Vinther (2003) chose even longer sentences, the majority of which exceeded 16 syllables and found that most native speakers were capable of repeating the sentences.”
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “Such pedagogical techniques include slow speech rate (Zhao 1997), repetition of oral texts (Jensen & Vinther 2003), and attending to prosodic features (Harley 2000).”
THE EFFECTS OF INPUT ENHANCEMENT ON GRAMMAR LEARNING AND COMPREHENSION (2013, background): “…have investigated the benefi ts of enhancing input in the written mode (i.e., bolding, underlining, or italicizing targeted language forms in a text) as well as the aural mode (i.e., exact repetition of the input or manipulation of the speech rate; see Jensen & Vinther, 2003 , for an overview).”
Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching (2015, unknown): “While these are intuitively appealing measures that teachers can implement, research has yet to demonstrate decisively that any of these efforts pay off (e.g., Jensen & Vinther 2003; Wong 2003).”
Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research (2007, background): “However, authentic contexts, form and speech rate should not be sacrificed in the interest of simplifying L2 listening for the language learner (Jensen & Vinther 2003).”