In-Store Valuation of Steak Tenderness

By Jayson L. Lusk, John A. Fox, Ted C. Schroeder, James Mintert, M. Koohmaraie. 2001

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b73ac10f3c8148c3c6e8a7aed725f7e1977764cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. W. Umberger
2. Maria Loureiro
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. Da‐Wen Sun
5. Paul Allen
6. Gamal ElMasry

In Economics and Econometrics

1. W. Umberger
2. Maria Loureiro
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. K. Grunert
5. Ted C. Schroeder
6. T. Feldkamp
7. Ana Angulo
8. J. Gil

In Plant Science

1. W. Umberger
2. Maria Loureiro
3. K. Grunert
4. Jayson L. Lusk
5. George E. Meyer
6. Ana Angulo
7. J. Gil
8. Wim Verbeke

Citations in the corpus

• Developing country consumers’ acceptance of biofortified foods: a synthesis (2015, unknown): “These mechanisms included nutrition information and the media through which such information is conveyed, the length and content of nutrition information, different branding options, the nature (national or international) of the branding or certification agency that is endorsing the biofortified…”
• Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain (2007, background): “Recent studies have explored consumers’ preferences for mandatory and voluntary beef labelling programs associated with credence attributes (Alfnes and Rickersten, 2003; Lusk et al., 2001; Roosen, Lusk and Fox, 2003; Enneking, 2004; Loureiro and Umberger, 2004).”
• Experimental Auction Procedure: Impact on Valuation of Quality Differentiated Goods (2004, background): “…second price, random nth price, first price, fifth price, Becker–DeGroot– Marschak (BDM), English, and combinatorial private-collective auctions (Lusk et al. 2001a, 1 Of course, experimental auctions are used extensively in the general economics literature, but applications mostly involve…”
• Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand (2005, background): “…valuation (e.g. Boccaletti and Nardella, 2000; Gil et al., 2000; Maruyama and Kikuchi, 2004), experimental auctions (Hoffman et al., 1993; Lusk et al., 2001, 2004; Rozan et al., 2004) and conjoint analysis (e.g. Bech-Larsen and Grunert, 2003; Enneking, 2004; Grunert et al., 2004) have…”
• A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability (2007, methodology): “The price variable also had two levels; a baseline price scenario was selected that corresponded with the mean price of ribeye steak published by the USDA in May 2003, and above this, a mark-up price based on the willingness-topay estimates denoted in the survey pre-test and previous studies (Dickin”
• Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. (2006, background): “Lusk et al. (2001) found that 51% of participants (n = 86) in a survey were willing to pay an average premium of $4.05/kg for guaranteed tender beef.”
• Visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for beef tenderness prediction (2008, background): “Several studies (Boleman et al., 1997; Lusk et al., 2001; Shackelford et al., 2001; Feuz et al., 2004) have shown that most consumers can discriminate levels of tenderness.”