Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing the Traditional Female Gender Role

By Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt, A. Eagly. 2002

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b726b3ac83278e5e6a656a6ba4a479d6edfd399d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Is Traditional Gender Ideology Associated with Sex-Typed Mate Preferences? A Test in Nine Nations (2006, methodology): “ASI and mate preference data appeared in Johannesen-Schmidt and Eagly (2002) .”
Benevolent and Hostile Sexism and preferences for romantic partners (2009, background): “For example, in data from nine nations, Eastwick et al. (2006) found that BS was associated with greater preferences for an older mate with good financial prospects, particularly in women (also see Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly, 2002).”
Rolling with the Changes: A Role Congruity Perspective on Gender Norms (2006, background): “For example, women who subscribe to the idealization of women’s traditional roles, as measured by endorsement of benevolent sexism, tend to desire a spouse who is older and a good financial prospect, thus perpetuating traditional gender roles (Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly, 2002).”
A Social Role Theory Perspective on Gender Gaps in Political Attitudes (2010, background): “For example, gender-normative goal endorsements predict career interest (Evans & Diekman, 2009), and ambivalent sexism predicts the characteristics people prefer in potential mates (Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly, 2002).”
Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating (2005, background): “It is important to note that the primary objective of social structural theory was to explain the origins of sex differences in human mate preferences, not sex differences in sociosexual mating strategies per se (Eagly & Wood 1999; Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly 2002; Wood & Eagly 2002).”
On Motivated Role Selection: Gender Beliefs, Distant Goals, and Career Interest (2009, methodology): “We chose ambivalent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 1996, 2001) as the sexism construct of interest because it captures two distinct dimensions that have been shown to be uniquely related to gendered decisions in previous research (e.g., Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly, 2002).”
When Women Become More Hostilely Sexist toward their Gender: The System-Justifying Effect of Benevolent Sexism (2007, background): “Research indicates that women high in BS tend to value the ability of potential male partners to provide resources and material benefits to their female partners and offspring more so than women low in BS ( Johannesen-Schmidt and Eagly 2002 ).”
Learning to Be Little Women and Little Men: The Inequitable Gender Equality of Nonsexist Children's Literature (2004, background): “Women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism is associated with a preference for a mate who is older and has greater earning potential ( Johannesen-Schmidt & Eagly, 2002 ), and the implicit endorsement of romance myths is associated with less interest in high status and highly paid occupations (Rudman &”