A Social Identity Theory of Leadership

By M. Hogg. 2001

2,018 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6670394dd65afc08792f5e577659d0d2cd29681

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

“Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development (2005, positive): “Consistent with Hogg’s (2001) argument that the most prototypical group members will emerge as leaders, Robins and Boldero speculate that the enactment of the leader and follower roles based on the levels of desired attributes will extend beyond dyads to groups and organizations. The implication for”
Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model (2007, background): “Intragroup liking and attraction, attributions of leadership and charisma, persuasiveness and social influence, are based on perceptions of prototypicality for a relevant shared ingroup (e.g., Hains, Hogg, & Duck, 1997; Hogg, 2001; Hogg & Hains, 1996; Oakes et al., 1998; Platow, van Knippenberg, Has”
When Interteam Conflict Spirals into Intrateam Power Struggles: The Pivotal Role of Team Power Structures (2017, background): “…structure, stability and clarity of resource allocation (Frenkel-Brunswik, 1949; Neuberg & Newsom, 1993), thereby reducing uncertainty and chaos (Hogg, 2001), and improving intrateam coordination (Halevy et al., 2011): see functionalist accounts of hierarchy (e.g., Halevy et al., 2011; Keltner…”
Competitive intelligence collection and use by sales and service representatives: how managers’ recognition and autonomy moderate individual performance (2015, methodology): “The second element which drives social identity is selfenhancement which can be defined as a motivational force which leads individuals to more strongly identify with an ingroup in order to enhance their self-esteem and as a way to reduce uncertainty (Hogg 2001).”
When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance (2013, background): “Leadership refers to the process of influencing others to pursue group goals (Bass, 2008; Hogg, 2001; Stogdill, 1950).”
Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality. (2005, methodology): “Leader group prototypicality is seen as an important determinant of leadership effectiveness in the social-identity analysis of leadership (Hogg, 2001; Hogg & van Knippenberg, 2003; van Knippenberg & Hogg, 2003).”
Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality (2020, methodology): “The social identity theory of leadership builds on the insight that leadership effectiveness is also contingent on shared social identity between leader and followers (Hogg, 2001; Turner & Haslam, 2001; van Knippenberg & Hogg, 2003).”
Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization (2009, background): “Team identity involves the perception of belonging to a group (Ashforth and Mael, 1989), while creating a sense of identity in a group is an important aspect of leadership effectiveness (Hogg, 2001).”