The Citizen Sector: Becoming as Entrepreneurial and Competitive as Business
By W. Drayton. 2002
444 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b51b1c026818458d7afeabd982b793821913bd2f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- B. Hoogendoorn
- Holger Patzelt
- Sophie Bacq
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Aidin Salamzadeh
- D. Kirby
- M. Azimi
- Johanna Mair
Citations in the corpus
- Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here (2010, background): “Drayton (2002) [They] have the same core temperament as their industry-creating, business entrepreneur peers. . . .”
- A process-based view of social entrepreneurship: From opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano (2010, background): “SE overturns this mechanism, focusing its interest not primarily on achieving a competitive economic advantage, but on spreading the social innovation as widely as possible in order to maximize social change and solve the problems that it aims to address (Drayton 2002; Chell 2007).”
- The Effect of Personality Traits on Social Entrepreneurship Intentions: A Field Research☆ (2015, background): “According to Drayton (2002) social entrepreneurs are change agents who focus on locating, identifying and resolving social problems.”
- Social Entrepreneurship: Creating New Business Models to Serve the Poor (2005, background): “Q Bill Drayton (2002), the founder of Ashoka, considers SE the result of very special personal traits shared by only a small percentage of the population ; traits that go beyond altruistic motivation and reflect a determination to change the whole of society.”
- The Effect of Experiential Social Entrepreneurship Education on Intention Formation in Students (2018, background): “The earliest support organization established for social entrepreneurs is Ashoka (Bornstein, 1998; Drayton, 2002).”
- Recognizing Opportunities for Sustainable Development (2011, background): “…highlights individuals’ knowledge of actual societal problems as drivers of opportunity recognition (e.g., Alford, Brown, & Letts, 2004; Drayton, 2002), but understanding what constitutes cultures and groups (the communal environment) may also contribute to recognizing opportunities…”
- Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate (2006, background): “The different types of entrepreneur, as described above, that have placed a primacy on the environment or society are sometimes categorized under the collective umbrella term of social enterprise (Drayton, 2002; DTI, 2002).”
- Beyond the Moral Portrayal of Social Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Approach to Who They Are and What Drives Them (2016, background): “According to Fisher (2004), some authors make a distinction between ethics and morality (e.”
- A Quantitative Comparison of Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Toward a More Nuanced Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship Organizations in Context (2013, background): “As such, innovativeness helps distinguish social entrepreneurship from ‘traditional nonprofits’ (Drayton 2002, Martin and Osberg, 2007, Lepoutre et al. 2011).”
- Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight (2006, background): “characterized by very special traits (Drayton, 2002), special leadership skills (Thompson, Alvy, & Lees, 2000), a passion to realize their vision (Bornstein, 1998), and a strong ethical fiber (Drayton, 2002).”
- Social Entrepreneurship: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead (2010, background): “Founders or managing directors provide their views on ‘what social entrepreneurship is’, ‘what social entrepreneurs do’ and ‘who they are’ (Drayton, 2002; Martin and Osberg, 2007; Elkington and Hartigan, 2008) and therefore critically shape identities at the field level and influence field…”