Who Is the Boss and Who Is Not? Accuracy of Judging Status

By M. Schmid Mast, Judith A. Hall. 2004

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4fe65319c04e780565b42d69b6bccab96b1474d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. (2005, methodology): “Furthermore, whatever one's level of V, the NVB that is displayed may be strongly influenced by whether one is striving to change one's V or is content to maintain it at its current level (Schmid Mast & Hall, 2003).”
A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions (2007, background): “…do not allow a direct comparison (e.g., Realo et al., 2003). and bedrooms (Gosling, Ko, Mannarelli, & Morris, 2002); university employees (Schmid Mast & Hall, 2004); college students having a competitive discussion (Bernieri et al., 1996); community-dwelling adults reading a weather report…”
Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. (2018, background): “…to accurately judge the social class of the targets, indexed as a correlation between perceived occupation status and target status (rs¼0.55–0.64), indicating that make-up and hairstyle choices elicit accurate signals of social class (Schmid Mast & Hall, 2004; see also Bjornsdottir & Rule, 2017).”
Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Review (2007, background): “Individuals convey status by displaying artifacts of power though their attire and accessories (e.g., Mast & Hall, 2004 ), engaging in conspicuous consumption (e.g., Fussell, 1983), associating with people high in power (e.g., Cialdini et al., 1976), and communicating dominance non-verbally (DePaul”
The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. (2014, background): “…signals, such as appearance, verbal and nonverbal behaviors, attitudes, and consumption choices (Ambady and Rosenthal 1993; Dubois et al. 2012; Hall et al. 2005; Knapp et al. 2009; Magee 2009; Ridgeway and Correll 2006; Ridgeway et al. 1998; Schmid Mast and Hall 2004; Todorov et al. 2005).”
Temporal Aspects of Facial Displays in Person and Expression Perception: The Effects of Smile Dynamics, Head-tilt, and Gender (2007, background): “Supportive evidence comes from Schmid Mast and Hall (2004b) who showed that when assessing status (a characteristic more stereotypically associated with men), perceivers were particularly sensitive to appearance cues in men, whereas observers focused on behavior when assessing women.”
A Naturalist’s View of Pride (2010, background): “Similarly, the literature on status judgments suggests that male and female perceivers are equally accurate at perceiving status in others, and this holds across the gender of the target individual being judged (Mast & Hall, 2004).”
The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences (2010, background): “In fact, Schmid Mast and Hall point out that ―in comparison to other domains were equally accurate in judging same-sex dyads as opposite-sex dyads, and in judging targets of the same sex as of the opposite sex.”
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status (2008, background): “There also tends to be high agreement between group members about the rank of each individual (eg, Schmid Mast & Hall, 2004 ), suggesting that the process of hierarchical differentiation is meaningful to group members, even when the rank ordering is based on a feature as subtle as nonverbal behavio”
Gender and emotion in context. (2008, background): “When the knowledge domain is malestereotypic (such as judging status or dominance), the differences appear to be much smaller or nonexistent (Schmid Mast & Hall, 2004).”