A Naturalist’s View of Pride

By Jessica L. Tracy, Azim Shariff, Joey T. Cheng. 2010

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49d6e1ba259f41187ee9718dc30a05724b2ecb2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Diana Onu
2. Joanne R Smith
3. Thomas Kessler

In Social Psychology

1. Diana Onu
2. M. Gouthier
3. Joanne R Smith
4. Thomas Kessler
5. M. Rhein

Citations in the corpus

• The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, unknown): “In modern times, this approach has become known as the basic emotion approach (e.g., Ekman 1972; 1992; Ekman & Cordaro 2011; Izard 1977; 1990; 2011; Lewis 2005; Panksepp 1998; 2007; Panksepp & Watt 2011; Tracy et al. 2010) or the natural kind approach (cf. Barrett 2006a).”
• Organizational pride and its positive effects on employee behavior (2011, background): “A leading theoretical model serving as a framework in this context is the AET developed by Weiss and Cropanzano (1996). Based on AET, stable work environment features such as job design or leadership style influence the occurrence of certain stimulus objects in the form of work events.”
• Admiration: A Conceptual Review (2016, background): “While pride has been shown to be involved in hierarchy regulation as individuals signal their own higher status by displaying pride (Tracy et al., 2010), admiration may signal the recognition of higher status in others.”