Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis.

By Judith A. Hall, Erik J. Coats, Lavonia Smith Lebeau. Psychological bulletin, 2005

814 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23b2e25b25258e0bc971183a75a7ebe9fd64014b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Contextualizing Emotional Display Rules: Examining the Roles of Targets and Discrete Emotions in Shaping Display Rule Perceptions (2009, background): “Hecht and LaFrance (1998) found that low-power individuals were more likely to display unfelt positive emotions than high-power individuals.”
Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and Prestige are Two Fundamental Pathways to Human Social Rank (2014, background): “…and rank of their displayers across cultures (Carney et al. 2005; Marsh et al. 2009; Shariff and Tracy 2009; Tracy and Matsumoto 2008), but also tend to be spontaneously adopted by powerful leaders or winners of physical fights (Tracy and Matsumoto 2008; for a review, see Hall et al. 2005 ).”
Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies (2014, background): “This is consistent with the notion that people in differing hierarchical positions focus their attention differently depending on what role they are in (Hall et al., 2005).”
Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A review (2009, background): “In addition to the varietyof role categorizationsystems, it is also known from social science that people’s roles in group interaction structure nonverbal behavior inimportantways[84,57].”
Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power (2005, background): “These differences were, moreover, often large in magnitude, and largely consistent with previous research on perceived power differences in nonverbal behavior (Hall et al., 2005).”
Gender Differences for Specific Body Regions When Looking at Men and Women (2008, background): “…behavior has been a focus of research for several decades in research on non-verbal behavior and has provided evidence that looking into each others’ face and eyes is an important feature of social interaction and face-to-face communication between individuals (for a review see Hall et al. 2005).”
My Eyes Are Up Here: The Nature of the Objectifying Gaze Toward Women (2013, background): “Face perception is critical to initial person perception because it quickly provides important information regarding identity, social categories, emotions, behavioral intentions, and health (Ekman 1993; Hall et al. 2005).”
Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion (2006, background): “Social psychological theories of power have focused on how power affects specific classes of social cognition, such as attribution (Kipnis, 1972) and stereotyping (Fiske, 1993), and specific classes of behavior, such as smiling, touching, and visual dominance (e.g., Dovidio & Ellyson, 1985; Goffman,”
Interpersonal Distances in Group Walking (2010, background): “This result can also be interpreted as a consequence of the greater hierarchy in all-male groups ( Hall et al. 2005; Schmid Mast 2002), since interpersonal distances and positioning are also strongly influenced by dominance and status exhibition.”