Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness

By Dawn Deeter-Schmelz, K. Kennedy, R. Ramsey. 2002

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Education, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b473a9e487edcc9b09e8fcaf7e088b3c4b9f9a44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Arthur Sweeney
2. Fernando Jaramillo
3. Carmel Herington
4. Randall S. Hansen
5. Paul E. Spector
6. Scott Weaven

In Education

1. Arthur Sweeney
2. Fernando Jaramillo
3. Carmel Herington
4. Randall S. Hansen
5. Paul E. Spector
6. Scott Weaven

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Arthur Sweeney
2. Fernando Jaramillo
3. Carmel Herington
4. Randall S. Hansen
5. Paul E. Spector
6. Scott Weaven

Citations in the corpus

• Multicultural influences on group learning: a qualitative higher education study (2008, background): “Issues such as team cohesion (Deeter-Schmelz et al. 2002), group formation (Bacon et al. 1998), group size (Latane et al. 1979), building exercises (Bolton 1999), group characteristics (Hewett & Hardesty 1999) and psychological ownership (Wood 2003) have received considerable attention in the…”
• The Effect of Action Orientation on the Academic Performance of Undergraduate Marketing Majors (2004, methodology): “Path analysis is adequate for examining relationships among multiple constructs measured using summated scales (e.g., Grapentine 2000) and has been widely used in the marketing literature (e.g., Deeter-Schmelz et al. 2002; Low et al. 2001).”
• Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects (2006, methodology): “It is clear that something needs to change, and Deeter-Schmelz, Kennedy, and Ramsey (2002) proposed that it is the responsibility of business schools to train students on teamwork.”