Teachers' beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking
By Anat Zohar, A. Degani, Einav Vaaknin. 2001
299 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b33248851e5dd15b89cc6d27d34097327989d567
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Anat Zohar
- Charlotte Dignath
- A. Ben David
- Yehudit Judy Dori
- M. Veenman
- María González‐Howard
- Suzanna Loper
- Rebecca Katsh-Singer
In Education
- Anat Zohar
- A. Ben David
- Yehudit Judy Dori
- Charlotte Dignath
- M. Veenman
- María González‐Howard
- Suzanna Loper
- Rebecca Katsh-Singer
Citations in the corpus
- Factors impacting teachers' argumentation instruction in their science classrooms (2016, background): “Other research suggests that teachers can see student abilities as barriers for argumentation instruction (Sampson & Blanchard, 2012; Zohar et al., 2001) and that teachers can oversimplify this complex task resulting in decreased opportunities and learning gains for students (McNeill, 2009).”
- Turnaround Students in High School Mathematics: Constructing Identities of Competence Through Mathematical Worlds (2008, background): “A substantial literature links the teachers’ beliefs about students, subject, and curriculum to teacher practices that have implications for student achievement (Gutierrez, 1996; Raudenbush, Rowan, & Cheong, 1993; Stodolsky & Grossman, 2000; Zohar, Degani, and Vaaknin, 2001 ).”
- The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies (2020, background): “…into initial teacher training in order to activate preservice teachers’ own self-regulation of learning and teaching, and to implement the promotion of SRL already early in teacher education (e.g., Kramarski and Kohen 2017; Kramarski and Michalsky 2010; Perry et al. 2008; Zohar et al. 2001).”
- Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? (2003, methodology): “Contrary to many practitioners’ beliefs (Zohar et al., 2001) and to the findings of some previous studies (e.”
- Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations (2008, background): “Zohar et al. (2001) found that many teachers, who believe that teaching higher order thinking is an important educational goal, believe that it is appropriate only for HA students.”
- Elements of Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge Regarding Instruction of Higher Order Thinking (2004, background): “The gist of the tension is that many of the programs for developing students’ higher order thinking have been based on constructivist, rather than transmissionof-knowledge models of instruction (Adey & Shayer, 1994; Tishman et al., 1995; Zohar et al., 2001), while many teachers hold a transmission-o”