Co‐occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analysis

By Nicholas Gotelli, Klaus Rohde. 2002

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Parasitology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b323086a5bc031724487dfda79a5b16fd69c503b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Nicholas Gotelli
2. Werner Ulrich
3. J. Veech
4. Brian J. McGill
5. J. Vamosi
6. Jürgen Kluge
7. Campbell O. Webb
8. S. Heard

In Genetics

1. J. Veech
2. W. John Kress
3. David L. Erickson
4. Brian J. McGill
5. G. Weiblen
6. Timothy J. S. Whitfeld
7. M. Kessler
8. Jürgen Kluge

In Parasitology

1. J. Veech
2. M. Kessler
3. Jürgen Kluge
4. Werner Ulrich
5. G. Bell
6. W. John Kress
7. Brian J. McGill
8. David L. Erickson

Citations in the corpus

• Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure (2009, background): “Various standardized metrics have thus been developed to enable comparisons of phylodiversity or phylogenetic structure among samples of different species richness; that is, ‘standardized effect size’ (Gotelli & Rohde 2002; Kembel & Hubbell 2006).”
• Phylogenetic diversity, trait diversity and niches: species assembly of ferns along a tropical elevational gradient (2011, methodology): “Thus we calculated the standardized effect size (Gotelli & Rohde, 2002) of the empirical phylogenetic distances relative to the phylogenetic distances of the null assemblages (MPDstand and MTDstand, respectively), which is defined as Metricstand ¼ Metricemp Metricnull =sdMetricnull This measure is…”
• Species co-occurrences and neutral models: reassessing J. M. Diamond's assembly rules (2004, background): “The debate about Diamond’s model focused mainly on two questions: whether the model is logically sound (Connor and Simberloff 1979) and how to construct adequate null models for testing it (Manly 1995, Gotelli and Graves 1996, Sanderson et al. 1998, Gotelli and Rhode 2002).”
• Significance testing in ecological null models (2012, methodology): “Multiple SES values can be averaged to test for patterns over multiple null model tests in a framework similar to meta-analysis (Gotelli and McCabe 2002; Gotelli and Rohde 2002; Nipperess and Beattie 2004; HornerDevine et al. 2007).”
• Change in community phylogenetic structure during tropical forest succession: evidence from New Guinea (2012, methodology): “…for each of 999 randomized matrices per plot and standardized eff ect sizes (SES) were calculated by comparing observed per-plot means relative to the distribution of per-plot mean distance under the null distribution (Gotelli and Rohde 2002). e standardized eff ect size is defi ned as ( X –”
• THE CO‐DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES IN RELATION TO THE NEUTRAL THEORY OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY (2005, background): “…formulation of assembly rules, and thus with the importance of competition in determining the composition of communities, while showing that these conclusions failed to apply to some groups of organisms for physiological or ecological reasons yet to be determined (see also Gotelli and Rohde 2002).”
• Weak and variable relationships between environmental severity and small‐scale co‐occurrence in alpine plant communities (2007, methodology): “Gotelli & McCabe 2002; Gotelli & Rohde 2002; Ribas & Schoereder 2002; Koide et al . 2005), including plants at very fine scales (Franzen 2004).”
• Null Versus Neutral Models: What's The Difference? (2006, result): “The predictions of the neutral model are more in line with empirical patterns described for marine ectoparasites (SES /0.35; Gotelli and Rohde (2002) ), which show little evidence for competitive structuring (Morand et al. 1999).”