Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure

By S. M. Vamosi, S. Heard, J. Vamosi, Campbell O. Webb. Molecular Ecology, 2009

617 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed29ccb901cb61ed98d596f0cf47409e6d0ce6bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Biodiversity and Climate Change: Integrating Evolutionary and Ecological Responses of Species and Communities (2010, background): “What emerges from recent reviews is that COMMUNITY PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE As reviewed by Vamosi et al. (2009), two patterns of community phylogenetic structure are commonly found: (a) phylogenetic clustering within communities, as a result of strong environmental filtering on phylogenetically…”
Phylogenetic turnover in tropical tree communities: impact of environmental filtering, biogeography and mesoclimatic niche conservatism (2012, background): “This pattern was found in most studies conducted at a deep taxonomic scale (here in angiosperm communities), at least in the presence of environmental gradients (e.g. Webb, 2000; Kembel & Hubbell, 2006; Hardy & Senterre, 2007; Parmentier & Hardy, 2009; reviewed in Vamosi et al., 2009).”
Phylogenetic signatures of facilitation and competition in successional communities (2009, background): “As a caveat however, studies have shown that different processes (i.e. predation, pollination, herbivory, facilitation) may lead to the same phylogenetic pattern and that the same process may lead to different phylogenetic patterns (see examples in Vamosi et al. 2009; Cavender-Bares et al. 2009).”
Maintenance of tree phylogenetic diversity in a highly fragmented rain forest (2012, methodology): “For each forest patch, we calculated four abundance-based phylogenetic metrics (Webb et al. 2002; Webb, Ackerly & Kembel 2008; Vamosi et al. 2009): mean phylogenetic distance (MPD), mean nearest taxon phylogenetic distance (MNTD), net related index (NRI) and nearest taxon index (NTI).”
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. (2009, methodology): “…relatedness of species within and across communities, or Ôphylogenetic community structureÕ, have been used to explore the processes underlying them and the scale at which they operate (Webb et al. 2002; Cavender-Bares et al. 2006; Swenson et al. 2006; Emerson & Gillespie 2008; Vamosi et al. 2008).”
Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach (2011, background): “…indices have focussed on species (e.g. Magurran, 2004), traits (e.g. Petchey, O’Gorman & Flynn, 2009) or phylogeny (e.g. Cavender-Bares et al., 2009; Vamosi et al., 2009) but very few have ever dealt with these three aspects of diversity simultaneously (but see Magurran, 2004, for species, trait…”
Testing the ability of functional diversity indices to detect trait convergence and divergence using individual‐based simulation (2016, methodology): “Merging the data collected by Emerson & Gillespie (2008) (Table 1), Vamosi et al. (2009) (Table 1) and HilleRisLambers et al. (2012) (Table 1), 33 studies find trait or phylogenetic convergence, 11 studies find divergence, and 22 studies find both.”
The Jungle of Methods for Evaluating Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Structure of Communities (2010, methodology): “…approaches has laid the foundation of the emerging research area of community phylogenetics, and has been the impetus for the development of many tools for detecting the underlying force structuring communities (see reviews in Webb et al. 2002, Cavender-Bares et al. 2009, Vamosi et al. 2009).”
Effects of landscape configuration and composition on phylogenetic diversity of trees in a highly fragmented tropical forest (2017, background): “2014), the next individual sampled is likely a close relative of at least one kind of individual already sampled (Vamosi et al. 2009).”
Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities (2012, result): “This inference is consistent with previous work on microbial communities in general and subsurface systems in particular (Horner-Devine and Bohannan, 2006; Bryant et al., 2008; Vamosi et al., 2009; Dumbrell et al., 2010; Herrera et al., 2010; Jones and Hallin, 2010; AmaralZettler et al., 2011).”