Phylogenetic diversity, trait diversity and niches: species assembly of ferns along a tropical elevational gradient

By Jürgen Kluge, M. Kessler. 2011

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f4c64232d08d7850e0c418825499846f47ae2d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better) (2015, background): “Kluge & Kessler (2011) found no significant pattern of phylogenetic diversity along the elevation gradient, whereas functional-trait diversity did vary along the gradient.”
Using functional and phylogenetic diversity to infer avian community assembly along elevational gradients (2019, unknown): “On the other hand, a pattern of communities with functional overdispersion is often attributed to interspecific competition resulting in either compet‐ itive exclusion or character displacement (Kluge & Kessler, 2011; MacArthur & Levins, 1967; Presley et al., 2018).”
Using trait and phylogenetic diversity to evaluate the generality of the stress‐dominance hypothesis in eastern North American tree communities (2014, result): “…used to elucidate processes structuring a wide range of communities (Ricotta and Moretti 2011), and several studies have found patterns consistent with the SDH (Swenson and Enquist 2007, Kluge and Kessler 2011, Machac et al. 2011, Graham et al. 2012, Mason et al. 2012, Spasojevic and Suding 2012).”
Global patterns in the divergence between phylogenetic diversity and species richness in terrestrial birds (2017, methodology): “…analysing the residuals of the modelled relationship (Davies & Buckley, 2011; Fritz & Rahbek, 2012), or using a null model based on randomized species assemblages, which are then compared to the empirical data; the latter having been used only for studies on a smaller scale (Kluge & Kessler, 2011).”
Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference components (2014, background): “By contrast, a functional pattern that is dominated by brich may reflect environmental filtering that favours certain traits over others along a gradient (Kluge & Kessler, 2011).”
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory (2012, background): “…analyses find evidence of trait clustering (underdispersion), suggesting that local environments can exclude species without the necessary physiological trait values (Table 1) (Cavender-Bares et al. 2004a, Kraft et al. 2008, Cornwell & Ackerly 2009, Swenson & Enquist 2009, Kluge & Kessler 2011).”
Phylogenetic clustering and overdispersion for alpine plants along elevational gradient in the Hengduan Mountains Region, southwest China (2014, background): “…phylogenetic frameworks have increasingly been applied to study biodiversity patterns in plants (Webb, 2000; Webb et al., 2006; Bryant et al., 2008; Kluge & Kessler, 2011) and animals (Graham et al., 2009; Auguet et al., 2010; Jones & Hallin, 2010; Machac et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012).”
Correlations between phylogenetic and functional diversity: mathematical artefacts or true ecological and evolutionary processes? (2013, background): “One obvious explanation is that species may evolve while persisting within an assemblage, thus decreasing the relationships between FD and PD (Kluge & Kessler 2011).”