THE CO‐DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES IN RELATION TO THE NEUTRAL THEORY OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY

By G. Bell. 2005

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab8ac8e1766cbef898e279527409770e9cafcaaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Bat assemblages on Neotropical land‐bridge islands: nested subsets and null model analyses of species co‐occurrence patterns (2008, background): “Most recently, tests for species co-occurrence patterns have also been extended to include neutral models (Ulrich, 2004; Bell, 2005; Gotelli & McGill, 2006), which posit ecological equivalence among species and argue for random processes shaping local and regional community structure (Hubbell, 2001)”
Weak and variable relationships between environmental severity and small‐scale co‐occurrence in alpine plant communities (2007, background): “© 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology , 95 , 1284–1295 with and confound interaction-driven patterns (e.g. Schoener & Adler 1991; Ulrich 2004; Bell 2005; Seabloom et al . 2005).”
Assessing the relative importance of neutral stochasticity in ecological communities (2014, background): “…is clearly key to a general understanding of ecological communities, but its effects are most often best characterized based on interactions with selection and drift, rather than lumped under the same umbrella as one or the other of these other processes (see also Bell 2005, Shipley et al. 2012).”
Abundance and co‐occurrence patterns of core and satellite species of ground beetles on small lake islands (2006, background): “It remains to be shown whether neutral models are able to generate lognormal types of SADs and non-randomness in cooccurrence (Bell 2005).”
The Ecological Niche: History and Recent Controversies (2015, methodology): “…species to environmental changes in space and time, (2) overyielding, 69 observed in mixtures of species relative to monocultures in the lab or in the fi eld, which has been used in polycultures since the Middle Ages 65 See Bell ( 2001 : 2417), Bell et al. ( 2001 : 121–128), Bell ( 2005 ).”
Species associations in an old‐growth temperate forest in north‐eastern China (2010, unknown): “patterns can be explained by substantially different theories (e.g. Chave 2004; Gilbert & Lechowicz 2004; Bell 2005).”
Community assembly along a soil depth gradient: contrasting patterns of plant trait convergence and divergence in a Mediterranean rangeland (2012, unknown): “Despite substantial recent advances in trait-based community ecology, the relative importance of environmental filters is still hotly debated, particularly at small scales where stochastic dispersal and biotic interactions may prevail over abiotic environmental constraints (Bell 2005; Vellend 2010).”
Null Versus Neutral Models: What's The Difference? (2006, methodology): “Ulrich (2004) and Bell (2005) both used the neutral model to generate binary presenceabsence matrices, and then used standard metrics of species co-occurrence such as the V-ratio (Schluter 1984) and the C-score (Stone and Roberts 1990), to quantify segregation of species.”
Mechanistic simulation models in macroecology and biogeography: state‐of‐art and prospects (2017, background): “Ecography E4 aw ard by varying size, quality, environmental variables, and spatial arrangements of cells, habitats, or patches (Bell 2005, Colwell and Rangel 2010, Cabral and Kreft 2012, Pagel and Schurr 2012, Schiffers et al. 2013, Boeye et al. 2014).”