Significance testing in ecological null models

By J. Veech. Theoretical Ecology, 2012

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5872f2c9f07afe5668733dbc851374786ad81abc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Dominique Gravel
2. I. T. Handa
3. P. Brousseau
4. Jizhong Zhou
5. D. Ning
6. J. Veech
7. Yunfeng Yang

In Global and Planetary Change

1. I. T. Handa
2. P. Brousseau
3. Dominique Gravel
4. Jizhong Zhou
5. D. Ning
6. J. Veech

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Dominique Gravel
2. I. T. Handa
3. P. Brousseau
4. Jizhong Zhou
5. D. Ning
6. Adam P. Arkin
7. M. Firestone
8. J. Veech

Citations in the corpus

• A probabilistic model for analysing species co-occurrence (2013, methodology): “Standardized effect sizes are often used to compare the output of different null models (Ulrich & Gotelli, 2007; Veech, 2012) where standardized effect size is calculated as the observed – expected value (of a test statistic or metric) divided by the standard deviation of the null distribution .”
• A quantitative framework reveals ecological drivers of grassland microbial community assembly in response to warming (2020, methodology): “For more details, please read the paper of Veech 2012 ‘Significance testing in ecological null models’ – Theoretical Ecology.”
• Trait matching and phylogeny as predictors of predator–prey interactions involving ground beetles (2018, methodology): “We accepted that a SES>1.96 (P 0.05) indicated a better goodness-of-fit than the null models (Veech 2012).”