Scores on a yes-no vocabulary test: correction for guessing and response style

By Ineke Huibregtse, Wilfried Admiraal, P. Meara. 2002

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2d66b1dddcac67a5504bb8c2fa4b42b4a5b07c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition (2010, background): “Following Huibregtse, Admiraal, and Meara (2002), one point was awarded for a " yes " response to a target item, and one point was awarded for a " no " response to a non-word.”
Scoring Yes–No vocabulary tests: Reaction time vs. nonword approaches (2012, methodology): “This measure has been traditionally called ‘delta m’ (Δm), and referred to in more recent studies as ‘Meara’s Δm’ (e.g. Huibregtse et al., 2002).”
Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English (2011, methodology): “Formula for computing Meara’s ΔM (Meara, 1996) ΔM ¼ h fð Þ 1þ h fð Þ h 1 fð Þ 1 ¼ h f 1 f f h Formula for computing ISDT (Huibregtse et al., 2002) ISDT ¼ 1 4h 1 fð Þ 2 h fð Þ 1þ h fð Þ4h 1 fð Þ h fð Þ 1þ h fð Þ kritiek/ : criticism, stro/ : straw, gemak/ : ease, tante/ : aunt, groenteboer/ :…”
Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students' language proficiency in English 1 (2006, unknown): “calculation of the test score, see Huibregtse, Admiraal, & Meara, 2002 ).”
The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge (2006, methodology): “The findings are thus in line with earlier work that has identified the h-f formula as a very serviceable alternative for at least nonresearch applications of the Yes/No format (Huibregtse et al., 2002: 240; Meara and Milton, 2002).”
Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface between Learning and Assessment (2005, background): “Pseudo-words are defined by Huibregtse et al. (2002) as 'words that fulfil the phonological constraints of the language but do not bear meaning(1)”