Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: the evolution of firm capabilities
By Constance E. Helfat. 2000
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2bc26e93050cbc3174d91bcdca1d16295fa9d84
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Johan Wiklund
- Holger Patzelt
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Subash Sasidharan
- Margaret A. Peteraf
- Giovanni Gavetti
- Véronique Ambrosini
- Cliff Bowman
In Strategy and Management
- Constance E. Helfat
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Violina P. Rindova
- D. Bergh
- Johan Wiklund
- Holger Patzelt
- Giovanni Gavetti
- Dave J. Ketchen
Citations in the corpus
- Foreign Direct Investment and R&D: Substitutes or Complements—A Case of Indian Manufacturing after 1991 Reforms (2011, background): “1226 the case of domestic firms, the presence of foreign firms may force them to invest in innovative activities so as to enhance their technological capability (Helfat, 2000).”
- Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance (2012, unknown): “Studies in strategic management increasingly focus on the microfoundations of capability, the study of which also requires study of organization memhers and their interactions (Argote & Ingram, 2000; Helfat, 2000).”
- Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses (2003, background): “Empirical studies have mainly focused on the direct link between individual strands or configurations of resources and performance, while less attention has been devoted to how management can utilize these resources more effectively ( Helfat, 2000 ).”
- Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities' Development (2005, background): “This view suggests capabilities evolve slowly and locally because the search mechanisms underlying their evolution are local (Nelson and Winter 1982, 2002; Helfat 2000), yet Polaroid developed these capabilities early on, thereby overcoming these difficulties.”
- Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios (2010, background): “Internally, competitive capabilities emerge through new uses or unexpected configurations of resources (Penrose 1959) and through developing unique capabilities based on experiential learning (Helfat 2000).”
- Social structure and technology spillovers from foreign to domestic firms (2012, unknown): “from? To some extent they are a product of incremental learning processes within firms (Helfat, 2000; Nelson & Winter, 1982).”
- Unpacking Team Familiarity: The Effects of Geographic Location and Hierarchical Role (2012, background): “While it is widely recognized that the ability to solve problems reliably with bundles of routines can lead to competitive advantage (Nelson and Winter 1982), less is known about the microfoundations of such capabilities (Helfat 2000).”
- The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, unknown): “…Quantitative Tobit regression Investigation of role of complementary technological knowledge and physical assets in dynamic capability accumulation Helfat (2000) Conceptual n/a Provision of overview how dynamic capabilities emerge Helfat & Peteraf (2009) Conceptual n/a Discussion of the…”
- The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles (2003, background): “Indeed, recent research on the evolution of organizational capabilities suggests the promise of dynamic resource-based theory (Helfat, 2000).”