Supersize in One Dimension, Downsize in Three Dimensions: Effects of Spatial Dimensionality on Size Perceptions and Preferences
By Pierre Chandon, Nailya Ordabayeva. 2009
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b21eac39086504b8eefb7c7f1cec0ddf00e82c12
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Pierre Chandon
- Brian Wansink
- A. Chernev
- S. Holden
- Natalina Zlatevska
- David Gal
- Chris Dubelaar
- Koert van Ittersum
Citations in the corpus
- Slim by Design: Redirecting the Accidental Drivers of Mindless Overeating (2014, background): “As a rule of thumb, doubling the size of a fast-food portion or product packages only makes it appear to be 50-70% bigger (Chandon & Ordabayeva 2009).”
- Whether Smaller Plates Reduce Consumption Depends on Who’s Serving and Who’s Looking: A Meta-Analysis (2016, unknown): “…we would expect twodimensional changes to have a greater effect than threedimensional changes in view of the compelling evidence that the perceived size and perceived change in size in containers is quite distinct from the actual change (Chandon and Ordabayeva 2009;Ordabayeva andChandon 2013).”
- Categorization Effects in Value Judgments: Averaging Bias in Evaluating Combinations of Vices and Virtues (2010, background): “…calories of larger meals is consistent with the diminishing marginal utility principle, according to which the marginal utility of an option decreases as its quantity (e.g., size) increases (Bernoulli 1738; Chandon and Ordabayeva 2009; Nowlis and Simonson 1996; Tversky and Kahneman 1991).”
- Sizing up the Effect of Portion Size on Consumption: A Meta-Analytic Review (2014, result): “We note that this reasoning may seem difficult to reconcile with research showing that consumer judgments of quantity are insensitive to, and tend to underestimate, increases in portion size (Chandon 2009; Chandon and Ordabayeva 2009; Van Ittersum and Wansink 2012).”
- Plate Size and Color Suggestibility: The Delboeuf Illusion’s Bias on Serving and Eating Behavior (2012, background): “Whereas we know that the shape of a glass (or cylinder) can influence visual perceptions of volume (Chandon and Ordabayeva 2009; Raghubir and Krishna 1999), serving behavior, and consumption (Wansink and Van Ittersum 2003, 2005), it is not known when and why this might happen with dinnerware, and…”