Paradigms and Theory Building in the Domain of Business Families

By K. Moores. 2009

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1f2c2cca8d67f90c9173b486718e601548e0ea6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Andrea Calabro
2. Mattias Nordqvist
3. Robert S. Nason
4. Thilo Pukall
5. Thomas M. Zellweger
6. Alfredo De Massis
7. Franz Willi Kellermanns
8. Nadine H. Kammerlander

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Andrea Calabro
2. Thomas M. Zellweger
3. Mattias Nordqvist
4. Thilo Pukall
5. Robert S. Nason
6. Alfredo De Massis
7. Nadine H. Kammerlander
8. Franz Willi Kellermanns

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Andrea Calabro
2. Mattias Nordqvist
3. Thomas M. Zellweger
4. Robert S. Nason
5. Thilo Pukall
6. Alfredo De Massis
7. Franz Willi Kellermanns
8. Nadine H. Kammerlander

Citations in the corpus

• From Longevity of Firms to Transgenerational Entrepreneurship of Families (2012, background): “Whereas the firm and the individual entrepreneur levels have received considerable attention in strategy, entrepreneurship, and family business research (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996; Scott & Rosa, 1996), we follow calls by researchers to include family as an additional level of analysis when investigating ”
• The Internationalization of Family Firms (2014, methodology): “By doing so, our article responds to calls for more theory integration and exchange between family business research and other disciplines (Moores, 2009; Sharma, Chrisman, & Chua, 1997).”