Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research

By T. D. Cook, M. R. Payne. 2001

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1a956ca4e178cb04c53bfbdc69876e4c9158e7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Slavin
2. Alan C. K. Cheung
3. Geoffrey D. Borman
4. N. Madden
5. B. Chambers
6. Tina Seidel
7. A. Chamberlain
8. R. Shavelson

Citations in the corpus

• Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results (2007, background): “The number of experimental studies in the past decade, however, is rather limited (Cook & Payne, 2002; Crawford & Impara, 2001).”
• Success for All: First-Year Results From the National Randomized Field Trial (2005, background): “The study also represented a response to the many doubts that have been raised about the viability and appropriateness of randomized experiments in school settings (Cook & Payne, 2002).”