THE PROMISE OF ENTREPRENEURS HIP AS A FIELD OF RESEARCH

By Scott A. Shane, Sankaran Venkataraman. 2000

13,012 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0630dc7bf2fdb25412aa4f512e373a56d8e4f21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Perceived uncertainty and behavioral logic: Temporality and unanticipated consequences in the new venture creation process (2019, background): “Firstly, causation assumes entrepreneurs take rational actions to discover an opportunity, establish plans, and look for resources to pursue the opportunity to create revenue for their new venture (Shane, 2000; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000).”
Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners Through Psychological Ownership (2013, neutral): “…as all actions taken by firm members that relate to the discovery and exploitation of entrepreneurial ideas and opportunities (Hornsby et al., 2009; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000; Smith and Di Gregorio, 2002), has been shown to be an antecedent of firm-level corporate entrepreneurship (Kuratko et…”
An effectual leadership perspective for developing rural entrepreneurial ecosystems (2018, background): “6 Systemic conditions 6.1 Enterprising individuals Shane and Venkataraman (2000) consider that entrepreneurship is the nexus of the enterprising individual and attractive opportunities.”
Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector (2009, background): “pillar of entrepreneurship research (Shane and Venkataraman, 2000).”
Happy and Proactive? The Role of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well–Being in Business Owners’ Personal Initiative (2012, background): “These three concepts imply: First, entrepreneurs must start something new to create and exploit opportunities (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000); thus, self-starting behavior is of high importance.”
Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy and business start‐up: developing a multi‐dimensional definition (2010, background): “…explainingwhat cognitive, motivational and affective processes are implicated in an individual’s decision to engage in entrepreneurial activities (Baron, 1998; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000; Baron, 2004) and how these processes are shaped by environmental and market factors (Mitchell et al., 2002).”
Causal ascriptions and perceived learning from entrepreneurial failure (2015, background): “Given the pervasiveness of failures, and the importance of understanding how individuals discover/re-discover, create/recreate, and exploit/re-exploit opportunities and with what consequences (Shane and Venkataraman 2000), it is imperative that our attention be devoted to this important, relevant, a”
The Role of Perceived University Support in the Formation of Students' Entrepreneurial Intention (2015, neutral): “CDS can provide awareness, motivation, and business ideas in the early stages of the entrepreneurial process, in which opportunity recognition and development take place (Shane and Venkataraman 2000).”
The Impact of Knowledge Resources on New Venture Performance (2009, background): “…can be described using the language of the resource-based view—such as rare, 1Some researchers have argued that opportunities exist in the market (e.g., Shane and Venkataraman 2000) while others hold that entrepreneurs enact opportunity and shape its nature (Gartner, Carter, and Hills 2003).”
Network-based research in entrepreneurship A critical review (2003, background): “…theory is found in the works of Wasserman and Faust (1994) and Knoke and Kulinkski (1982). network density (McEvily and Zaheer, 1999; Burt and Raider, 2000) and heterogeneity among network contacts as proxies (Hara and Kanai, 1994; Zhao and Aram, 1995; Baum et al., 2000; Silverman and Baum, 2000).”
How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry (2010, background): “New opportunities may involve introducing new goods and services, exploring new markets, developing new production processes and/or combining rawmaterials in newways (Venkataraman,1997; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000).”
Religious institutions and entrepreneurship (2014, methodology): “This is referred to as the macro approach to entrepreneurship research (Ardichvili et al. 2003; Eckhardt and Shane 2003; Shane and Venkataraman 2000; Venkataraman 1997).”
Beyond Achievement: Entrepreneurship as Extreme Experience (2006, background): “The entrepreneurial experience includes the multiplicity of events to which the individual is exposed as he/she moves through the stages of the entrepreneurial process, typically conceptualized as opportunity identification, concept development, resource need recognition, resource acquisition, imple”