How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry
By S. Bhagavatula, Tom Elfring, A. Tilburg, Gerhard G. van de Bunt. 2010
442 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ae6d18d6a552202070a24eb42fe2aa87ba7393b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Curtis R. Sproul
- Justin L. Davis
- Joakim Wincent
- Dirk De Clercq
- J. Ruiz-Navarro
- C. Camelo‐Ordaz
- J. P. Diánez‐González
- M. Nandakumar
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Joakim Wincent
- D. Lim
- Chang Hoon Oh
- J. Ruiz-Navarro
- Justin L. Davis
- Curtis R. Sproul
- E. van Burg
- Georges Romme
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Social Capital of Entrepreneurs and Small Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual and Methodological Moderators (2014, background): “…social capital, or the resources that entrepreneurs may access through their personal networks (Adler and Kwon, 2002), allows entrepreneurs to identify opportunities (Bhagavatula et al., 2010), mobilize resources (Batjargal, 2003), and build legitimacy for their firms (Elfring and Hulsink, 2003).”
- Individual–Level Resources and New Business Activity: The Contingent Role of Institutional Context (2013, background): “Various resources or capital types may be relevant, but the most frequently studied are financial, human, and social capital (e.g., Autio & Acs, 2010; Bhagavatula et al., 2010; Chandler & Hanks, 1998; Cooper et al., 1994; Davidsson & Honig, 2003; Honig, 1998).”
- Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement (2014, unknown): “2009), social capital (Bhagavatula et al. 2010; Davidsson and Honig 2003), the use of different information sources (Ozgen and Baron 2007) and other individual characteristics (e.”
- Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions (2020, background): “These include individual-level capital (Bhagavatula et al., 2010; Davidsson & Honig, 2003) and regional- or national-level contextual factors (Bowen & De Clercq, 2008; Welter, 2011).”
- A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors (2014, background): “Social capital plays a mediating role between human capital and opportunity recognition as well as resource mobilization (Bhagavatula et al. 2010).”
- Human Capital and Entrepreneurship Research: A Critical Review and Future Directions (2016, background): “…Chaganti et al., 1995 Haber & Reichel, 2007 Matusik et al., 2008 Honig, 2001 DeTienne et al., 2008 Pollock et al., 2009 Ucbasaran et al., 2003 Bhagavatula et al., 2010 Autio & Acs, 2010 Audretsch & Keilback, 2004 Colombo & Grilli, 2010 Simsek & Heavey, 2011 Rauch et al., 2005 Wennberg et…”
- The Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Factors (2016, background): “On the other hand, entrepreneurs could facilitate the access to crucial resources and information regarding new potential entrepreneurial opportunities (Bhagavatula et al., 2010).”
- Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship (2014, background): “For instance, in a ‘closed network’ involving strong ties, the mechanism of acquiring resources from trusted connections can enable resource acquisition and result in better opportunity exploitation (Bhagavatula et al., 2010).”