A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching1
By N. Schmitt, Diane Schmitt. Language Teaching, 2012
369 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The high-frequency vocabulary of English has traditionally been thought to consist of the 2,000 most frequent word families, and low-frequency vocabulary as that beyond the 10,000 frequency level. This paper argues that these boundaries should be reassessed on pedagogic grounds. Based on a number of perspectives (including frequency and acquisition studies, the amount of vocabulary necessary for English usage, the range of graded readers, and dictionary defining vocabulary), we argue that high-frequency English vocabulary should include the most frequent 3,000 word families. We also propose that the low-frequency vocabulary boundary should be lowered to the 9,000 level, on the basis that 8–9,000 word families are sufficient to provide the lexical resources necessary to be able to read a wide range of authentic texts (Nation 2006). We label the vocabulary between high-frequency (3,000) and low-frequency (9,000+) as mid-frequency vocabulary. We illustrate the necessity of mid-frequency vocabulary for proficient language use, and make some initial suggestions for research addressing the pedagogical challenge raised by mid-frequency vocabulary.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b032abfe15a34dbd444d3b8ae5cc478033c0958e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007) (2015, background): “…a complete set of graded readers that specifically target ‘mid-frequency’ vocabulary (that of the third to eighth 1,000 levels, as defined by Schmitt & Schmitt 2014), such that significant numbers of word families in target k-level zones are met frequently, and mainly in environments of…”
- Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda (2019, background): “This can lead to quite haphazard vocabulary selection (Schmitt & Schmitt, 2014).”
- Not just ‘small potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations (2017, background): “The input from instructed EFL environments may not relate strongly to corpus frequency simply because vocabulary selection tends to be relatively unprincipled and opportunistic in both written materials (Schmitt & Schmitt, 2014) and teacher talk (Horst, 2010).”
- How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? (2014, background): “Schmitt and Schmitt (2012) also suggested applying the term mid-frequency vocabulary to the 6,000 word families making up the 4 th 1000 to 9 th”