Estimating Actor, Partner, and Interaction Effects for Dyadic Data Using PROC MIXED and HLM: A User–Friendly Guide

By L. Campbell, Deborah Kashy. 2002

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b00235b3e4f919f64dce11b7d5086b718ceee80f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. (2007, methodology): “Thus, for the analyses of all couple interaction data, we used an Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM; e.g., Campbell & Kashy, 2002).”
Family Processes and Suicidal Ideation among Chinese Adolescents in Hong Kong (2011, neutral): “Previous studies have illustrated the application of IGC using PROC MIXED in SAS[16,17,18], HLM[19], R[20], and SPSS[21].”
Attachment and daily sexual goals: A study of dating couples (2008, methodology): “We used hierarchical linear modeling (HLMwin version 6.0; Kenny, Kashy, & Bolger, 1998; Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002) to analyze the data, as other researchers using APIM with dyadic data have suggested (e.g., Campbell & Kashy, 2002; Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006).”
Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships (2005, methodology): “This was first tested using the dyadic method explained by Campbell and Kashy (2002). A separate multiple regression analysis was conducted for Dunbar & Burgoon: Perceptions of power and dominance 219 04 dunbar (ds) 23/3/05 8:34 am Page 219”
Theory in Progress: Dyadic Power Theory: Constructing a Communication-Based Theory of Relational Power (2004, methodology): “…researchers in the past needed to conduct separate analyses to meet the “independence of observations” assumptions of statistical tests, it is now possible to conduct true dyadic analyses with new statistical techniques recently proposed (e.g., Campbell & Kashy, 2002; Gonzalez & Griffin, 1997).”
Relational consequences of compulsive Internet use: a longitudinal study among newlyweds (2011, methodology): “This procedure is comparable with the SAS mixed procedure (Campbell & Kashy, 2002; Singer, 1998) and provides the same parameter estimates and tests of signiﬁcance (Peugh & Enders, 2005).”
Day-to-Day Changes in Intimacy Predict Heightened Relationship Passion, Sexual Occurrence, and Sexual Satisfaction (2012, methodology): “These effects were estimated using a multilevel modeling approach, with responses from each romantic partner nested within their appropriate dyad using recommendations made by Campbell and Kashy (2002).”
The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: a self-determination theory perspective. (2007, methodology): “We used the PROC MIXED routine in SAS with restricted likelihood estimation to estimate the coefficients (see Campbell & Kashy, 2002).”
Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety. (2005, methodology): “We tested the following models using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS (Campbell & Kashy, 2002).”
To Invest or Not? The Role of Coworker Support and Trust in Daily Reciprocal Gain Spirals of Helping Behavior (2015, background): “…highlights the dependence between dyadic data, suggesting that “a person’s independent variable score affects both his or her own dependent variable score (known as the actor effect), and his or her partner’s dependent variable score (known as the partner effect)” (Campbell & Kashy, 2002: 328).”
The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies (2005, methodology): “Additionally, the model has been recommended in the area of the study of families (Rayens & Svavardottir, 2003), close relationships (Campbell & Kashy, 2002), small groups (Bonito, 2002), and as a framework for evaluating treatment outcomes in couple therapy (Cook, 1998; Cook & Snyder, in press).”
Stability of aggression during early adolescence as moderated by reciprocated friendship status and friend’s aggression (2005, methodology): “The current study deals with the issue of interdependence through the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM: Kashy & Kenny, 2000; Campbell & Kashy, 2002) by utilising Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) to separately estimate the effects of the child (i.e., the actor), their friend (i.e., the…”