The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies
By Marlon Boarnet, Randall Crane. 2001
526 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afd1e7b1a7ace0a38aebfe30c2e66d26d4cfd0dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Chandra R. Bhat
- S. Handy
- R. Ewing
- Frank Witlox
- Veronique Van Acker
- Jessica Y. Guo
- Bert van Wee
- Chris Zegras
In Transportation
- J. De Vos
- R. Ewing
- Frank Witlox
- Robert Cervero
- S. Handy
- Chandra R. Bhat
- Veronique Van Acker
- Bert van Wee
Citations in the corpus
- Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us? (2005, background): “Recent literature reviews document more than seventy studies published during the 1990s that have explored and quantified these relationships (e.g., Handy 1996; Boarnet and Crane 2001b; Ewing and Cervero 2001).”
- When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour (2010, background): “One exception is Boarnet and Crane (2001) and Crane (1996) who developed a simple theoretical framework in which they argue that the built environment influences travel behaviour through its influence on travel costs.”
- Deconstructing development density: Quality, quantity and price effects on household non-work travel (2008, background): “Boarnet and Crane (2001b) criticize the use of such methods for not accounting for the independent effects of land use characteristics and making policy implications explicit.”
- Travel and the Built Environment (2010, background): “A number of studies, including Boarnet and Crane (2001), Cao, Mokhtarian, and Handy (2009b), Cervero (2002a), Cervero and Kockelman (1997), Crane (1996), Kockelman (1997), and Zhang (2004), provide economic and behavioral explanations of why built environments might be expected to influence travel…”
- Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes (2017, background): “Travel behavior theory has long recognized the role of attitudes and preferences in influencing travel behavior (Boarnet and Crane, 2001).”
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels (2007, background): “However, several studies reviewed by Crane (2000) and some other works (see, for example, Boarnet and Sarmiento, 1998; Boarnet and Crane, 2001; Bhat and Lockwood, 2004; Bhat et al., 2005; and Bhat and Zhao, 2002) have found that BE measures have little to no impact on such dimensions of travel behav”
- The Impact of Residential Density on Vehicle Usage and Energy Consumption (2005, background): “Boarnet and Crane (2001) point out that persons who dislike driving might both drive less and choose to live in a high density, mixed use neighborhood that supports transportation alternatives other than driving.”
- Walking, Urban Design, and Health (2008, background): “The most recent generation of planning studies on urban design and travel behavior has its roots in research on land use and automobile travel (e.g., Boarnet and Crane 2001b; Cervero and Kockelman 1997; Ewing and Cervero 2002; Hanson and Hanson 1981; Vickerman 1972).”
- Understanding the spectrum of residential energy consumption: A quantile regression approach (2010, background): “Boarnet and Crane, 2001). This current study contributes to this debate about the role of housing type on energy consumption pattern. Climate is important in accounting for space conditioning energy use and, to some extent, of other uses due to water heating component. Cooling degree days (CDD) and ”
- The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile (2010, methodology): “This perspective, extending beyond Crane’s, shows that the ultimate ambiguity of the BE’s influence on travel behavior may not only arise through the uncertain influence of trip costs (disutility) on net travel, but also through the influence on potential activity destinations (utility).”
- Urban Structure and Energy—A Review (2008, background): “In a review of studies of the land use/transport interaction, Boarnet and Crane (2001a) conclude that if land use does influence travel behaviour, it is not directly, but through indirect influences on travel speed and distance, and that: It thus appears premature to either conclude that the built…”