A Rasch analysis of Raven’s standard progressive matrices

By Andre van der Ven, J. Ellis. 2000

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afa5e9048674fae3077e6433c592add65e4386e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Thinking in Pictures as a Cognitive Account of Autism (2011, background): “Several behavioral studies of TD individuals point to the possibility of distinct visual and verbal strategies being effective on the RPM (DeShon et al. 1995; Lynn et al. 2004; van der Ven and Ellis 2000 ), and we are currently conducting computational studies to investigate whether visual-only alg”
A twin-family study of general IQ (2008, background): “Studies have shown that the Raven is largely unidimensional (Rost & Gebert, 1980), but there are also indications that the Raven test might be multidimensional (Lynn, Allik, & Irwing, 2004; Van der Ven & Ellis, 2000; Vigneau & Bors, 2005).”
Sex Differences on Three Factors Identified in Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (2004, methodology): “Van der Ven and Ellis (2000) concluded that the SPM contains two significant factors which they identified as (1) gestalt continuation present in early items for which bthe correct solution must be found according to some Gestalt continuation ruleQ; this factor appears to be the same or closely…”
Chapter Six - How Working Memory Capacity Affects Problem Solving (2012, result): “Consistent with these earlier distinctions, Van der Ven and Ellis (2000) suggested that only a subset of later items in the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) rely on reasoning processes for solution.”
Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis. (2004, methodology): “This was suggested by Van der Ven and Ellis (2000) who have shown in a Rasch analysis for unidimensionality of the SPM, in a sample of 905 Dutch 12- to 15-year-olds, that the test contains two factors identified as (1) bgestalt continuationQ present in Set A and items 1–6 in Set B for which bthe…”
Brother–sister differences in the g factor in intelligence: analysis of full, opposite-sex siblings from the NLSY1979 (2007, unknown): “…for a sex difference in g consists of the meta-analysis of the Raven's Matrices (Lynn & Irwing, 2004, 2005) but, although the Progressive Matrices is typically highly g-loaded, its item content is heterogeneous (Lynn, Allick, & Irwing, 2004; Mackintosh & Bennett, 2005; Van der Ven & Ellis, 2000).”
Number skills and knowledge in children with specific language impairment (2005, background): “Analyses of both child and adult versions of Raven’s matrices tests indicate that variation is attributable to perceptual processes in addition to reasoning (van der Ven & Ellis, 2000).”
Improved matrix reasoning is limited to training on tasks with a visuospatial component (2013, methodology): “The Raven's tests were designed tomeasure the unidimensional construct, Gf (Raven, 2000; van der Ven & Ellis, 2000).”