The secret life of fluency.

By Daniel M. Oppenheimer. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2008

673 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af9e28d9ea1e219931adaff60c61ce7e8ee61ecd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Imagery Fluency and Narrative Advertising Effects (2013, background): “Processing fluency also might affect processing strategies (Oppenheimer 2008)—another potential research direction.”
The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes (2017, background): “Processing fluency can have a direct effect on language attitudes through the application of naïve theories, which provide relevant inference rules (path d, Figure 1) (Alter & Oppenheimer, 2009; Oppenheimer, 2008).”
Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (2009, positive): “Alter and Oppenheimer (2006, 2008a) used three different instantiations of fluency-phonemic linguistic fluency, visual perceptual fluency, and familiaritybased retrieval fluency to show that the general construct of fluency affects judgments of value (see also Borges, Goldstein, Ortmann, &…”
Is Noise Always Bad? Exploring the Effects of Ambient Noise on Creative Cognition (2012, methodology): “Because we hypothesized a causal relationship between processing disfluency and construal level, we conducted a test of multiple mediation using the multiple-step multiplemediator model (Hayes, Preacher, and Myers 2011; Preacher and Hayes 2008).”
Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility (2010, background): “In general, the ease of processing stimuli, or “processing fluency,” affects the way stimuli are judged (e.g., Oppenheimer, 2008; Schwarz, 2004).”
Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation (2015, neutral): “33 Oppenheimer 2008, 237.”
International handbook of emotions in education. (2014, background): “For instance, fluency is a cognitive feeling that signals flow and absence of obstacles or difficulties, whereas disfluency signals problems or sources of resistance that need to be tackled (Oppenheimer, 2008).”
The Power of Simplicity: Processing Fluency and the Effects of Olfactory Cues on Retail Sales (2013, background): “Building upon previous esearch demonstrating that solving cognitive tasks depends on rocessing fluency (Oppenheimer 2008; Reber, Schwarz, and inkielman 2004), these studies show that performance on a ognitive task is enhanced by the presence of a simple ambient cent (in comparison to a complex one…”
Disentangling accent from comprehensibility (2012, background): “Processing fluency, which refers to individuals’ subjective experience of ease or difficulty in processing information on a cognitive task (Oppenheimer, 2008), 1 The term “grammar” is used here to differentiate morphology and syntax from other aspects of language (e.g., phonology, lexis); it does…”
Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. (2013, background): “Most importantly, Study 2 found that people were only able to disconfirm their prior biases when they had cognitive resources available, consistent with other evidence that disfluency can prompt an analytical and critical mindset (e.g., Oppenheimer, 2008).”
Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethics (2017, background): “One view is that they can be differentiated based on their demands on working memory (De Neys, 2006; Evans & Stanovich, 2013; Oppenheimer, 2008); working memory is a system for the temporary holding and manipulation of information during the performance of a range of cognitive tasks.”
On Language Processing Shaping Decision Making (2017, background): “Processing difficulty and emotionality may have collateral effects on the way people relate to and construe a given situation (Alter & Oppenheimer, 2008; Van Boven, Kane, McGraw, & Dale, 2010).”
Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications (2014, background): “This idea is indeed gaining ground in the field (e.g., Alter, Oppenheimer, Epley, & Eyre, 2007; Oppenheimer, 2008; Thompson, 2009; Thompson & Morsanyi, 2012; Thompson et al., 2011; Topolinski, 2011).”