Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition?
By Joseph G. Walls, George R. Widermeyer, Omar El Sawy. 2004
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adec312ba574b6aea450ff1bf4c02307f852cf4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Izak Benbasat
- Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang
- Kalle J. Lyytinen
- Leona Chandra Kruse
- Stefan Seidel
- Ole Hanseth
- Youngjin Yoo
- Paul A. Pavlou
Citations in the corpus
- Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet (2010, methodology): “It is a design theory, because it consists of ‘how to’ design principles and rules (Walls et al., 1992, 2004; Markus et al., 2002) backed by ‘because of’ justifications derived from a kernel theory – Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory (Holland, 1995).”
- A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research (2007, background): “[56] expected its widespread adoption within IS, believing that this would lead to IS research having more impact on practice through close ties between DS research and practical applications.”
- Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle (2020, background): “Research has examined design knowledge in terms of design theory (Gregor & Jones, 2007; Walls, Widermeyer, & El Sawy, 1992, 2004) and technological rules (e.g., Bunge, 2009; van Aken, 2001) and in recognition of a continuum from the knowledge represented in an instantiation of an artifact, through…”
- Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations (2007, background): “It would also be interesting to investigate the specific theories and processes that can guide the practical design of interactivity and vividness, such as suggested by Walls et al. (2004).”
- The Anatomy of a Design Theory (2007, unknown): “Furthermore, Walls et al. (2004) themselves wondered if their depiction of design theory components was too unwieldy for use.”
- A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives (2012, unknown): “We justify this on several grounds: First, we observe that the ISDT of Walls et al. (1992, 2004) is currently more familiar to the majority of DSRIS practitioners (March & Storey, 2008) and since that ISDT definition guided many past exemplars of DSRIS (Adomavicius, Bockstedt, Gupta, & Kauffman,…”