A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research

By Ken Peffers, Tuure Tuunanen, Marcus A. Rothenberger, Samir Chatterjee. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007

7,335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/186e57ffadbe45a30de067b0259357cded8db968

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Gamification: a systematic review of design frameworks (2017, positive): “(2015) Digital Information Systems Educators Implementing game mechanisms and elements in non-game applications like e-learning A framework based on social engagement which can be applied to e-learning environments and based on the Design Science Research Methodology (Peffers et al. 2007) It compris”
A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives (2012, neutral): “During an implementation phase of the project (Peffers et al., 2007; Vaishnavi & Kuechler, 2009), tentative solution artifacts are designed and constructed; this phase is frequently advised by another set of [design] kernel theories, which ground the implementation of similar artifacts.”
A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research (2012, neutral): “They do not provide guidance for selecting between methods or designing the evaluation part of DSR. Peffers et al [9] divide what others call evaluation into two activities, demonstration and evaluation.”
Developing Maturity Models for IT Management (2009, methodology): “The process description of design science requires an iterative procedure for the development of a problem solution ( Peffers et al. 2007 ).”
Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, methodology): “…artifact solves a problem instance via simulation, case study, etc, and by evaluating empirical evidence quantifying the impact of the artifact (Peffers et al., 2007) and using “ well ‐ executed evaluation methods ” such as observational, analytical, experimental, testing, and descriptive…”
A Mathematical Programming Approach for Server Consolidation Problems in Virtualized Data Centers (2010, methodology): “Our paper follows a design science approach as outlined in [30].”
Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle (2020, methodology): “We did not test our proposed formulation of design principles empirically and did not move beyond a proof of concept (comparable with the formulation of other approaches including Peffers et al., 2007, Gregor, 2006; Gregor & Jones, 2007; Hevner et al., 2004).”
Action Design Research (2011, methodology): “In this, ADR differs from the stage-gate models proposed in prior work (see March and Smith 1995; Peffers et al. 2008).”