A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle (2020, background): “…is to complement work that seeks to understand, explain, and sometimes predict the development, use, and impact of information systems and related sociotechnical artifacts in organizations and other social contexts (Baskerville et al., 2018; Hevner et al., 2004; Kuechler & Vaishnavi, 2012).”
FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research (2016, methodology): “…of literature within and outside DSR that identifies different methods and paradigms for how to evaluate (e.g., in Nunamaker et al, 1990/1991; March & Smith, 1995; Hevner et al, 2004; Vaishnavi & Kuechler, 2004; Venable, 2006; Peffers et al, 2008; Sein et al, 2011; Kuechler & Vaishnavi, 2012).”
Future directions for behavioral information security research (2013, background): “According to Kuechler and Vaishnavi (2012), the design of new technology artifacts includes tacitly embedding existing theories from a number of research domains into the development of a new piece of technology.”