Evaluation Models: New Directions for Evaluation

By D. Stufflebeam. 2001

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac246dfa0a521debfbccaebc8d7dfe398eb55a29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Mixed Methods in Intervention Research: Theory to Adaptation (2007, background): “Bamberger, Rugh, and Mabry (2006) and Stufflebeam (2001) noted that mixed methods evaluations are complex and can take the form of multistage projects.”
Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. (2014, methodology): “Although process evaluation frameworks have been proposed in other fields such as organizational change, public health, and community programme evaluation (e.g. Dawson, 1994; Linnan & Steckler, 2002; Stufflebeam, 2001), here we”
A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009 (2011, background): “(p. 18) Relatedly, Stufflebeam (2001) and more recently, Stufflebeam and Shinkfield (2007), in their analysis of evaluation models and approaches against the Joint Committee’s (1994) Program Evaluation Standards, commented that ‘‘there is not much to recommend about theory-based program evaluation s”
Strategies for Managing Evaluation Anxiety: Toward a Psychology of Program Evaluation (2002, unknown): “ethics, professional issues and the like (e.g., Donaldson & Scriven, 2002b; Mark, 2002; Mark, Henry, & Julnes, 2000; Rossi, Freeman, & Lipsey, 1999; Shadish et al., 1991, 1995; Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2001; Stufflebeam, 2001).”
Measuring the Outcomes of Leadership Development Programs (2009, methodology): “The LPOM focuses on self-assessment measures, which are frequently used in summative program evaluation (Stufflebeam, 2001) and are conceptualized by the EvaluLEAD conceptual framework presented by Grove et al. (2005).”
The Metaevaluation Imperative (2001, methodology): “The metaevaluation of theoretical approaches was the present author’s assessment of alternative program evaluation models (Stufflebeam, 2001).”