Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association test.

By S. A. Ottaway, Davis C. Hayden, Mark A. Oakes. 2001

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac21582923dbbb1689c097c3f58d1df600997828

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Greenwald
2. S. McFarland
3. R. Fazio
4. Lewis M. Franklin
5. Nilanjana Dasgupta
6. John T. Jost
7. Michael A. Olson
8. B. Pelham

In Social Psychology

1. A. Greenwald
2. Bertram Gawronski
3. Brian A. Nosek
4. R. Fazio
5. Nilanjana Dasgupta
6. John T. Jost
7. Michael A. Olson
8. W. Rowatt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Greenwald
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. Bertram Gawronski
4. Mahzarin R. Banaji
5. R. Fazio
6. John T. Jost
7. Nilanjana Dasgupta
8. Michael A. Olson

Citations in the corpus

• Patterns and Personality Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Christians and Muslims (2005, background): “Although this alternative interpretation is intuitively appealing, “familiarity” explanations for IAT effects have been carefully examined and ruled out by previous researchers (see Dasgupta et al. 2000; Greenwald and Nosek 2001; Ottaway, Hayden, and Oakes 2001 ) and were not directly tested in thi”
• Sexual Strategies: A Journey Into Controversy (2003, unknown): “ Ottaway et al. (2001) found that even when Hispanic, Black, and White names were equated in terms of objective frequency and subjective familiarity, people still nonconsciously favored White Americans over Black and Hispanic Americans.”
• The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, unknown): “…of stimulus items comprising the attitude object categories (Dasgupta, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2003; Dasgupta, McGhee, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2000; Ottaway, Hayden, & Oakes, 2001; Rudman, Greenwald, Mellot, & Schwartz, 1999), and whether subjects were right or left-handed (Greenwald & Nosek,…”
• Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “Since then, researchers have observed IAT effects even after carefully matching stimuli and/or statistically controlling for familiarity (Rudman et al. 1999, Dasgupta et al. 2000, Ottaway et al. 2001).”
• Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction (2006, unknown): “These include self-esteem (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000), racist attitudes (Monteith, Voils, & Ashburn, 2001; Ottaway, Hayden, & Oakes, 2001; Rudman, Greenwald, Mellott, & Schwartz, 1999), homophobia (Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001), sexual risk taking (Marsh, Johnson, & Scott-Sheldon, 2001), and racia”